Barker v Herbert
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1911 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Noble v Harrison
....... Barker v. Herbert [ 1911 ] 2 K. B. 633 applied. . Observations of Best J. in Earl of Lonsdale v. Nelson ( 1823 ) 2 B. & C. 302 and Tarry ......
-
Leo Larkin and Others v Iqbal Joosub and Others
...Ciaran Callan (as personal representative of the estate of Ismail Joosub) Defendants Cases mentioned in this report:- Barker v. Herbert [1911] 2 K.B. 633. Carroll v. Clare County Council [1975] I.R. 221. Cockburn v. Smith [1924] 2 K.B. 119. Cunard and Wife v. Antifyre Ld [1933] 1 K.B. 551. ......
-
Holbeck Hall Hotel Ltd and Another v Scarborough Borough Council
...the existence of a nuisance on his land comes to the knowledge of the occupier it is his duty to abate it or endeavour to do so. (See Barker v Herbert [1911] 2 KB 633 and the decision of the majority of the Court of Appeal, Bankes LJ and Astbury J in Job Edwards v The Company of Proprietor......
-
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
...a trespasser's act and an act of nature - as he had made when he was Mr. Justice Wright, in Noble v. Harrison.There, after referring to Barker v. Herbert (1911) 2 King's Bench 633, he said (1926 2 King's Bench at page 341): "The nuisance in that case was caused by the act of a trespasser, ......
Request a trial to view additional results