Barton v Wright Hassall LLP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Sumption,Lord Wilson,Lord Carnwath,Lord Briggs,Lady Hale
Judgment Date21 February 2018
Neutral Citation[2018] UKSC 12
Date21 February 2018
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
188 cases
  • R the Good Law Project v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 January 2022
    ...referred to in the judgments:Abela v Baadarani [2013] UKSC 44; [2013] 1 WLR 2043; [2013] 4 All ER 119, SC(E)Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12; [2018] 1 WLR 1119; [2018] 3 All ER 487, SC(E)Boxwood Leisure Ltd v Gleeson Construction Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 947 (TCC)Cain v Francis [2......
  • Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 November 2018
    ...that the contents of the claim form are brought to the attention of the person to be served, there is, as Lord Briggs said in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 W.L.R. 1119 (at [28]) a second important general purpose: “That is to notify the recipient that the claim has ......
  • Tax Returned Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 October 2022
    ...principles applicable to the power conferred by CPR 6.15(1) to permit alternative service were confirmed by the Supreme Court in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119 (“ Barton”). In R (Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2022] EWCA C......
  • Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v The Chedington Court Estate Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 October 2021
    ...in person which were not given to represented litigants. In this connection I referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Barton v Wright Hassall [2018] 1 WLR 1119. I might also have added a reference to R v Brown (Milton) [1998] 2 Cr App R 364, 371, a decision of the Criminal Divisi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 firm's commentaries
  • The Weekly Roundup: The Alliterative Edition
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 23 December 2021
    ...of a Claim Form under CPR 7.4 (as opposed to, for example, the 2015 Regulations). These are considered in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12. Such an application is markedly more difficult, as it involves the engagement of the court's originating jurisdiction. An application- under ......
  • The Weekly Roundup: The Alliterative Edition
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 23 December 2021
    ...of a Claim Form under CPR 7.4 (as opposed to, for example, the 2015 Regulations). These are considered in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12. Such an application is markedly more difficult, as it involves the engagement of the court's originating jurisdiction. An application- under ......
  • Navigating UK Sanctions Against Russian Persons In English Court Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 21 September 2022
    ...applicable rules and deadlines. This is, for example, encapsulated by the statement from the Supreme Court in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12 that a lack of representation "would not usually warrant applying a lower standard of compliance with the rules or court orders, unless th......
  • Service Can Be A Right Hassle
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 25 October 2018
    ...I gave my ten top tips for service of proceedings. As if on cue the Supreme Court has just given judgment in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, a case concerning an unsuccessful attempt to serve proceedings by email. In my top tips I highlighted the Court's power to retrospectively......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Small Claims Procedure in the County Court A Practical Guide - Seventh edition Preliminary Sections
    • 30 August 2021
    ...v Pereira & Pain & Pain [2011] EWCA Civ 241, [2011] 1 WLR 2391, [2011] 3 All ER 392, [2011] CP Rep 28 245 Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119, [2018] 3 All ER 487 50 Bashir v Hanson [1999] 12 CL 143, [1999] CLY 418, Cty Ct 195 Berridge (Paul) (t/a EAB Builders) v R......
  • Failures for Consideration: Re‐Analysing Jurisdiction in Unjust Enrichment Claims
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 83-5, September 2020
    • 1 September 2020
    ...Dickinson, ‘Faulty Powers: One-Star Service in the English Courts’ [2018]LMCLQ 189, 191.26 CPR, r 1.2(b).27 In Bar ton vWright Hassle LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2017] 1 WLR 2945, at [44], Lord Briggsindicated that PD6A should give effect to the OO, and the court more generally accepted thatenforc......
  • Step-by-Step Guide to Starting a Small Claims Case
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Small Claims Procedure in the County Court A Practical Guide - Seventh edition Part 1. Claims
    • 30 August 2021
    ...5.6.5). 57 CPR 6.17(2). 58 A litigant in person who decided to effect service himself overlooked this in Barton v Wright Hassall [2018] UKSC 12. 2.3.20 Make a diary note (step 19) The court will give the case a unique claim number (actually a mixture of letters and numbers) and (unless you ......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...and 8.151–8.152 above. 105 See para 8.10 above, and paras 8.170–8.172, 8.176–8.179 and 8.234 below. 106 Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] 1 WLR 1119. 107 See paras 8.53–8.56 above. 108 Cap 50, 2005 Rev Ed. 109 See paras 8.76, 8.126–8.128 and 8.148–8.150 above. 110 Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai P......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT