Basch v Stekel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2001
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Schroder Exempt Property Unit Trust and Another v Birmingham City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 July 2014
    ...to remain in place. This fiction permeates the whole agreement." This was confirmed, in its proper historical context, by Chadwick LJ in Basch v Stekel [2001] L&TR 1 at [20] and following. At [22]. He said: "[T]he tenancy itself does cease to exist as an estate in the land demised by the le......
  • Shaw v Doleman
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 April 2009
    ...Lord Nicholl's explanation of its effect in Hindcastle, as cited by Lord Justice Mummery in paragraph 25 above. Chadwick LJ's exegesis in Basch v Stekel [2001] L.&T.R. 1 (2001) 81 P. & C.R. DG1 is relevant: 22 Lord Nicholls explained in Hindcastle v. Barbara Attenborough why the former prac......
  • Reox Holdings Plc v Cullen and Another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 July 2012
    ...2006 IEHC 38 HALSBURY'S LAWS OF ENGLAND 2006 VOL 27(1) PARA 75 ACTIVE ESTATES LTD v PARNASS & ANOR 2002 3 EGLR 13 BAUSCH v STECKEL 2001 L&TR 1 UNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD v BURNLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL 1978 AC 904 HAMILTON v HAMILTON 1982 IR 466 JC SAVAGE SUPERMARKET LTD & BECTON v BORD PLEA......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT