Bata v Bata
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1948 |
| Year | 1948 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Newsat Holdings Ltd and Others v Zani
...sent: Diamond v Bank of England [1979] 1 Lloyd's Rep 335 (a close analogy being drawn with publication in the context of a libel action: Bata v Bata [1948] WN 366). It is also right that under the previous Rules of the Supreme Court, service out of the jurisdiction was permitted if the ac......
-
Diamond v Bank of London and Montreal Ltd
...or paper is sent from one country to another, the tort is committed in the place where the publication takes place. That is shown in Bata v. Bata (1943) Weekly Notes 366. 11 The truth is that each tort has to be considered on its own to see where it is committed. In many torts the place may......
-
Berezovsky and Another v Forbes Inc. and Another
...Q.B. 185; McLean v. David Syme & Co. Ltd. (1970) 92 W.N.(N.S.W.) 611; (2) that publication takes place where the words are heard or read ( Bata v. Bata (1948) W.N. 366; Lee v. Wilson and Mackinnon (1934) 51 C.L.R. 276); and (3) that it is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove that publi......
-
Alison Chabloz v Crown Prosecution Service
...criminal offences, such as those we are considering here, centre on the sending of the material (see for example Bata v Bata [1948] WN 366 and the difference between libel actionable in tort and seditious 21 In the Canadian Supreme Court case of Crookes v Newton [2011] 3 SCR 269, the majori......
Request a trial to view additional results