Bata v Bata

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1948
Date1948

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • Diamond v Bank of London and Montreal Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 November 1978
    ...or paper is sent from one country to another, the tort is committed in the place where the publication takes place. That is shown in Bata v. Bata (1943) Weekly Notes 366. 11 The truth is that each tort has to be considered on its own to see where it is committed. In many torts the place may......
  • Berezovsky and Another v Forbes Inc. and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 May 2000
    ...Q.B. 185; McLean v. David Syme & Co. Ltd. (1970) 92 W.N.(N.S.W.) 611; (2) that publication takes place where the words are heard or read ( Bata v. Bata (1948) W.N. 366; Lee v. Wilson and Mackinnon (1934) 51 C.L.R. 276); and (3) that it is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove that publi......
  • Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 December 2002
    ...531. 122 Invoking Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 [ 117 ER 75]. 123 eg Isaacs & Sons Ltd v Cook [1925] 2 KB 391; Bata v Bata [1948] WN 366. 124Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson [1971] AC 458 at 466 (‘ Distillers’); cf Voth (1990) 171 CLR 538 at 125 Perritt, ‘Jurisdict......
  • Berezovsky v. Michaels et al.
    • Canada
    • 11 May 2000
    ...Q.B. 185, refd to. [paras. 15, 61, 70]. McLean v. Syme (David) & Co. (1970), 92 W.N.(N.S.W.) 611, refd to. [para. 15]. Bata v. Bata, [1948] W.N. 366 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Lee v. Wilson and Mackinnon (1934), 51 C.L.R. 276, refd to. [para. 15]. Ratcliffe v. Evans, [1892] 2 Q.B. 524 (C.A......
  • Get Started for Free