Bater v Bater

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1950
Year1950
Date1950

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
218 cases
  • Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd; Boonsom Boonyanit
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1995
  • Blyth v Blyth
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 May 1965
    ...247). In that case all the members of the court expressed their concurrence with the statement of principle by Lord Justice Denning in Bater v. Bater (1951) Probate, 55, at pages 36 and 37. The learned lord justice there said: "The difference of opinion which has been evoked about the stand......
  • Mehigan v Duignan
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1997
    ...[1996] 2 I.R. 321 applied; Maloc Construction Ltd. (In Liquidation) v. Chadwick (1986) 3 N.Z.C.L.C. 99 and Bater v. BaterUNK [1950] 2 All E.R. 458 not followed. 3. That the discretion conferred by s. 204 must be exercised in a responsible but also in a constitutional fashion. In assessing l......
  • Judd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Greer [ 1958 ] N.I. 156 , 161–164 applied ... Davis v. Davis [ 1950 ] P. 125 ; [ 1950 ] 1 All E.R. 40 , C.A.; Bater v. Bater [ 1951 ] P. 35 ; 66 T.L.R. (Pt. 2) 589 ; [ 1950 ] 2 All E.R. 458 , C.A. and Hornal v. Neuberger Products Ltd. [ 1957 ] 1 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Proving Antitrust Damages in Jurisdictions Outside the United States
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Proving Antitrust Damages. Legal and Economic Issues. Third Edition Part III
    • 8 December 2017
    ...documents that are in their possession, power, or control without the need for any 103. Id. at 137-38 (quoting Bater v. Bater, [1950] 2 All E.R. 458, 459 (C.A.)). 104. Id . at 137-38. See , e.g. , Maritime Travel Inc. v. Go Travel Direct.Com Inc., 2008 NSSC 163, para. 92 (Can.), aff’d , 200......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Proving Antitrust Damages. Legal and Economic Issues. Third Edition Part III
    • 8 December 2017
    ...F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 2004), 60, 70 Barton & Pittinos, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 118 F.3d 178 (3d Cir. 1997), 25 Bater v. Bater, [1950] 2 All E.R. 458, 459 (C.A.))., 350 Bathke v. Casey’s Gen. Stores, 64 F.3d 340 (8th Cir. 1995), 27 Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385 (1986), 126 Table of......
  • The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-3, September 2008
    • 1 September 2008
    ...[151]–[159] (Branson and Katz JJ). 58 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, 343–4 (Latham CJ), 361–3 (Dixon J); Bater v Bater [1950] 2 All ER 458, 459 (Denning LJ). 308 Federal Law Review Volume 36 ____________________________________________________________________________________ evi......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    ...20Bartlett v Smith (1843) 11 M & W 483, 152 ER 895. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .280Bater vBater [1951] P35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342Blaškić(Case No. IT-95-14), Decision on StandingObjection of Defence to Admission ofHearsay with No I......
  • Get Started for Free
5 provisions
  • Rheoliadau Awdurdodau Lleol (Trefniadau Gweithrediaeth) (Swyddogaethau a Chyfrifoldebau) (Cymru) 2007
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 2007
    ...anwes a sefydliadau eraill lle caiff anifeiliaid eu bridio neu eu cadw er mwyn cynnal busnes. Adran 1 o Ddeddf Anifeiliaid Anwes 1951 (p. 35)33; adran 1 o Ddeddf Sefydliadau Byrddio Anifeiliaid 1963(p. 43)34; Deddfau Sefydliadau Marchogaeth 1964 a 1970 ( 1964 p. 70 a 1970 p. 70)35; adran 1 ......
  • Rheoliadau Awdurdodau Lleol (Trefniadau Amgen) (Cymru) 2007
    • United Kingdom
    • Wales
    • 1 January 2007
    ...anwes a sefydliadau eraill lle caiff anifeiliaid eu bridio neu eu cadw er mwyn cynnal busnes. Adran 1 o Ddeddf Anifeiliaid Anwes 1951 (p. 35)37; adran 1 o Ddeddf Sefydliadau Byrddio Anifeiliaid 1963(p. 43)38; Deddfau Sefydliadau Marchogaeth 1964 a 1970 ( 1964 p. 70 a 1970 p. 70)39; adran 1 ......
  • Rheoliadau Trefniadau Gweithrediaeth Awdurdodau Lleol (Swyddogaethau a Chyfrifoldebau) (Cymru) 2001
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 2001
    ...anwes a sefydliadau eraill lle caiff anifeiliaid eu bridio neu eu cadw er mwyn cynnal busnes. Adran 1 o Ddeddf Anifeiliaid Anwes 1951 (p. 35)( 34) ; adran 1 o Ddeddf Sefydliadau Byrddio Anifeiliaid 1963(p. 43)( 35)]; Deddf Sefydliadau Marchogaeth 1964 a 1970 (1964 p. 70 a 1970 p. 70( 36) );......
  • Rheoliadau Awdurdodau Lleol (Trefniadau Amgen) (Cymru) 2001
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 2001
    ...anwes a sefydliadau eraill lle caiff anifeiliaid eu bridio neu eu cadw er mwyn cynnal busnes. Adran 1 o Ddeddf Anifeiliaid Anwes 1951 (p. 35)( 34) ; adran 1 o Ddeddf Sefydliadau Byrddio Anifeiliaid 1963(p. 43)( 35)]; Deddf Sefydliadau Marchogaeth 1964 a 1970 (1964 p. 70 a 1970 c. 70)( 36) )......
  • Get Started for Free