Battling corruption in Malaysia: What can be learned?

Date01 April 2019
Publication Date01 April 2019
AuthorNur Shafiqa Kapeli,Nafsiah Mohamed
SubjectAccounting & Finance,Financial risk/company failure,Financial crime
Battling corruption in Malaysia:
What can be learned?
Nur Shafiqa Kapeli
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia, and
Nafsiah Mohamed
Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia
Purpose Corruption is a serious problemin Southeast Asian countries. Based on the average ranking of
Transparency Internationals Corruption Perception Index, Malaysia is ranked as the second least corrupt
country among Southeast Asiancountries. However, this country is still facing problems in its ght against
corruption, in which efforts undertaken to prevent corruption have been said to be unsatisfactory.The
purpose of this paper is hence to examine previousliterature for the possible factors affecting the success of
anti-corruptionefforts in Malaysia.
Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes previous studies conducted on Malaysias
experiencesin its ght against corruption.
Findings The ndings of this paper indicate four attributes that lead to the failure of anti-corruption
efforts in Malaysia.
Originality/value This paper will be usefulfor scholars, policymakers and anti-corruptionpractitioners
who are interestedin Malaysias experiences in ghting corruption.
Keywords Malaysia, Corruption, Southeast Asian, Anti-corruption initiatives,
Financial criminology
Paper type Conceptual paper
Corruption can be dened as the misuse of public power, ofce or authority for private
benet through bribery, extortion, inuence peddling, nepotism, fraud, speed money or
embezzlement(UNDP, 1999). This denition is useful, as it includes not only bureaucratic
and political corruptionbut also private sector corruption. This is as:
[...] private sector is involved in most cases of government corruption, which includes the misuse
of money or favours for personal gains, abuse of ocial authority or inuence in exchange for
money to acquire special personal advantages (UNDP, 1999).
Corruption is one of the most serious problems among SoutheastAsian countries. Based on
a recent survey conducted by TransparencyInternational through its Corruption Perception
Index (CPI), Singapore was ranked as the least corrupt country, followed by Malaysia,
Thailand, the Philippines and others. Table I shows the average ranking of 11 Southeast
Asian countries on CPIfrom 2012 to 2016.
Among the 11 SoutheastAsian countries listed out in Table I, only Singapore was said to
be successfulin addressing problems of corruption. Other countries, including Malaysia,
was said to be less successfulor failedin their ght against corruption. What is more
frustrating is that efforts to prevent corruption in Malaysia and Singapore started on the
same foundation, as these two countries were once British colonies. According to Caiden
(2013), the success of anti-corruption initiatives in a ght against corruption is determined
corruption in
Journalof Financial Crime
Vol.26 No. 2, 2019
pp. 549-555
© Emerald Publishing Limited
DOI 10.1108/JFC-04-2018-0044
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT