Baylis v London (Bishop)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1913 |
| Year | 1913 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
-
Dextra Bank and Trust Company Ltd v Bank of Jamaica
...v Ecclesiastical Comrs for England and Wales [1880] 6QBD 234, and of the Court of Appeal in Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127 [1911 – 13] All E.R. Rep. 273. Instead, where change of position has been relied upon by the defendant, it has been usual to approach the problem as one of ......
-
Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd
...had not done so he was entitled to' be repaid." 87The authors also refer to the decision of this court in Baylis v. Bishop of London (1913) 1 Ch 127. That was a case where money had been paid under a mistake of fact and there was no question of estoppel—see per Hamilton L.J. at 141. This co......
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Original Appellants and Cross-Respondents) v Karpnale Ltd (Formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Original Respondents and Cross-Appellants)
... ... Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England and Wales (1880) 6 Q.B.D. 234 , and of the Court of Appeal in Baylis v. Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch. 127 ... Instead, where change of position has been relied upon by the defendant, it has been usual to approach the ... ...
-
Redland City Council v Kozik
...Sadler v Evans (1766) 4 Burr 1984 at 1986 [ 98 ER 34 at 35]. 263 Holt v Markham [1923] 1 KB 504 at 513. 264 Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127 at 265 (2001) 208 CLR 516. 266 (2001) 208 CLR 516 at 545–551[76]–[89]. 267 Including Myers v Hurley Motor Co (1927) 273 US 18 at 24; Atlant......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Change of position and restitution for wrongs: 'ne'er the twain shall meet'?
...(2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal 276, 278-9; Edelman and Bant, above n 6, 319; Nolan, above n 73, 173. See also Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, 140 (Hamilton (96) See Scottish Equitable plc v Derby [2001] 3 All ER 818, 832 (Simon Brown L J). (97) Lipkin Gorman [1991] 2 AC 548, 578......
-
The Rise and Fall of the Mistake of Law Rule
...an unenforceable oral 61 (1867) LR 2 UL 149. 62 Note difference between unjust enrichment and restitution ie action and remedy. 63 [1913] 1 Ch 127, at 140. 6 [1923] 1 KB 504, at 513. 65 (1995) 54 CJ 578. [1996] 1 IR 468; [1996] 2 ILRM 547 (SC). 67 Ibid., at 558. 68 (1987) 162 CLR 221. 2000]......
-
In Defence of Quasi‐Contract
... ... show how considerations of fairness play a role in explaining why liability is imposed in 7 Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, 140.For a contemporary version of exactly this fear see M ... ...