Baylis v London (Bishop)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1913 |
Year | 1913 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Dextra Bank and Trust Company Ltd v Bank of Jamaica
...v Ecclesiastical Comrs for England and Wales [1880] 6QBD 234, and of the Court of Appeal in Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127 [1911 – 13] All E.R. Rep. 273. Instead, where change of position has been relied upon by the defendant, it has been usual to approach the problem as one of ......
-
Black Nominees Ltd v Nicol
...1 W.L.R. 1555;Snook v. London & West Riding Investments Ltd.[1967] 2 Q.B. 786; In re Vince [1892] 2 Q.B. 478;Baylis v. Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch. 127. PART VII 1. We, the Commissioners who heard the appeal, took time to consider our decision, and gave it in writing on 3rd February 1971 a......
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Original Appellants and Cross-Respondents) v Karpnale Ltd (Formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Original Respondents and Cross-Appellants)
...v. Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England and Wales (1880) 6 Q.B.D. 234, and of the Court of Appeal in Baylis v. Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch. 127. Instead, where change of position has been relied upon by the defendant, it has been usual to approach the problem as one of estoppel: see, e......
-
Black Nominees Ltd v Nicol (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...1 W.L.R. 1555;Snook v. London & West Riding Investments Ltd.[1967] 2 Q.B. 786; In re Vince [1892] 2 Q.B. 478;Baylis v. Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch. 127. PART VII 1. We, the Commissioners who heard the appeal, took time to consider our decision, and gave it in writing on 3rd February 1971 a......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Change of position and restitution for wrongs: 'ne'er the twain shall meet'?
...(2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal 276, 278-9; Edelman and Bant, above n 6, 319; Nolan, above n 73, 173. See also Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, 140 (Hamilton (96) See Scottish Equitable plc v Derby [2001] 3 All ER 818, 832 (Simon Brown L J). (97) Lipkin Gorman [1991] 2 AC 548, 578......
-
The Rise and Fall of the Mistake of Law Rule
...an unenforceable oral 61 (1867) LR 2 UL 149. 62 Note difference between unjust enrichment and restitution ie action and remedy. 63 [1913] 1 Ch 127, at 140. 6 [1923] 1 KB 504, at 513. 65 (1995) 54 CJ 578. [1996] 1 IR 468; [1996] 2 ILRM 547 (SC). 67 Ibid., at 558. 68 (1987) 162 CLR 221. 2000]......
-
In Defence of Quasi‐Contract
...norms of fairness. I show howconsiderations of fairness play a role in explaining why liability is imposed in7Baylis vBishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, 140.For a contemporary version of exactly this fear seeM. McInnes,‘ResistingTemptations to“Justice”’ in R. Chambers et al (eds),Philosophic......