Baylis v London (Bishop)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1913 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Dextra Bank and Trust Company Ltd v Bank of Jamaica
...v Ecclesiastical Comrs for England and Wales [1880] 6QBD 234, and of the Court of Appeal in Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127 [1911 – 13] All E.R. Rep. 273. Instead, where change of position has been relied upon by the defendant, it has been usual to approach the problem as one of ......
-
Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd
...he had not done so he was entitled to' be repaid." 87The authors also refer to the decision of this court in Baylis v. Bishop of London (1913) 1 Ch 127. That was a case where money had been paid under a mistake of fact and there was no question of estoppel—see per Hamilton L.J. at 141. Thi......
-
Black Nominees Ltd v Nicol (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...1 W.L.R. 1555;Snook v. London & West Riding Investments Ltd.[1967] 2 Q.B. 786; In re Vince [1892] 2 Q.B. 478;Baylis v. Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch. 127. PART VII 1. We, the Commissioners who heard the appeal, took time to consider our decision, and gave it in writing on 3rd February 1971 a......
-
Black Nominees Ltd v Nicol
...1 W.L.R. 1555;Snook v. London & West Riding Investments Ltd.[1967] 2 Q.B. 786; In re Vince [1892] 2 Q.B. 478;Baylis v. Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch. 127. PART VII 1. We, the Commissioners who heard the appeal, took time to consider our decision, and gave it in writing on 3rd February 1971 a......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Change of position and restitution for wrongs: 'ne'er the twain shall meet'?
...(2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal 276, 278-9; Edelman and Bant, above n 6, 319; Nolan, above n 73, 173. See also Baylis v Bishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, 140 (Hamilton (96) See Scottish Equitable plc v Derby [2001] 3 All ER 818, 832 (Simon Brown L J). (97) Lipkin Gorman [1991] 2 AC 548, 578......
-
The Rise and Fall of the Mistake of Law Rule
...an unenforceable oral 61 (1867) LR 2 UL 149. 62 Note difference between unjust enrichment and restitution ie action and remedy. 63 [1913] 1 Ch 127, at 140. 6 [1923] 1 KB 504, at 513. 65 (1995) 54 CJ 578. [1996] 1 IR 468; [1996] 2 ILRM 547 (SC). 67 Ibid., at 558. 68 (1987) 162 CLR 221. 2000]......
-
In Defence of Quasi‐Contract
...norms of fairness. I show howconsiderations of fairness play a role in explaining why liability is imposed in7Baylis vBishop of London [1913] 1 Ch 127, 140.For a contemporary version of exactly this fear seeM. McInnes,‘ResistingTemptations to“Justice”’ in R. Chambers et al (eds),Philosophic......