Beaman v A.R.T.S. Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1949
Date1949

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
107 cases
  • Terence Philip Ramsden v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 20 December 2019
    ...as a result of a reckless disregard of the interests of the Claimant. It is said that the case is analogous to the case of Beaman v A.R.T.S. Ltd [1949] 1 KB 550. I do not consider this case to be analogous. Beaman concerned a bailee who decided to close its business. It therefore decided to......
  • McBain v McDonald
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 January 1991
    ...v. ANDREW GILLIES McBAIN DEFENDANT Citations: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S11 KING V VICTOR PARSONS & CO 1973 1 WLR 29 BEAMAN V ARTS LTD 1949 1 KB 550 HEGARTY V O'LOUGHRAN 1990 ILRM 403 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S11(2)(A) Synopsis: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS Time limit Extension - Ground - Fr......
  • Mander v Evans
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 15 May 2001
    ... ... Beaman v ARTS Ltd [ 1949 ] 1 KB 550 , CA and Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) [ 1980 ] Ch 515 distinguished ... The ... ...
  • Khoo Yew Boon; Miranda
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries