Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1957
Year1957
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
55 cases
  • Kirkham v Boughey
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Arul Chandran v Gartshore and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 March 2000
    ...exception of loss of amenities: at [32].] Addis v Gramophone Company, Limited [1909] AC 488 (folld) Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd [1957] 2 QB 1 (folld) Bliss v South East Thames Regional Health Authority [1987] ICR 700 (refd) Brown v Waterloo Regional Board of Commissioners of Police (......
  • The Queen (on the application of Shimei Youngsam) v The Parole Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 April 2017
    ...forming part of the reasoning of the court. 22 In contrast is the view of Devlin J (as he then was) as expressed in Behrens v Bartram Mill Circus [1957] 2 QB 1 and summarised thus in Cross and Harris at page 58: "…the ratio decidendi consists of the reason or reasons for a decision which th......
  • Essa v Laing Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 January 2004
    ...reflects the fact that the general rule of the common law, then as well as now, as Devlin J stated in Behrens v. Bertram Mills Circus [1957] 2 QB 1 at 28, is that "mental suffering caused by grief, fear, anguish and the like is not assessable". It is only in certain torts, such as defamatio......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Perspectives on Animals and the Law Part V. New Tactical Approaches
    • 19 June 2015
    ...Canada Inc, 2007 FC 516 .................................................................... 303 Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus, Ltd, [1957] 1 All ER 583 ........................................91, 95 Blades v Higgs (1865), 1 ER 1474 (HL) ..........................................................
  • A Monkey in the Middle: Reflections on Darwin the Macaque and the (R)evolution of Wild Animals in Canadian Common Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Perspectives on Animals and the Law Part III. The Fundamental Classification
    • 19 June 2015
    ...employed by courts in this area of law, although there are some exceptions: see, for example, Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus, Ltd , [1957] 1 All ER 583 [ Behrens ]. In this context, “species” means a group of animals commonly understood to have certain distinguishing characteristics. 37 An ......
  • AFTER MALCOLMSON V MEHTA: CHARTING NEW WATERS IN THE LAW OF HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE — CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PERSPECTIVES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...18 Ibid, at p 452. 19 [2000] 2 SLR 446. 20 Ibid, at p 452, para 13, adopting Devlin J’s position in Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd[1957] 2 QB 1 at p 28. 21 Supra, note 3, at p 471, para 52. 22 This is further discussed below in paras 69—80. 23 Supra, note 3, at p 473, para 55. 24 [1992]......