Bellenden (orse Satterthwaite) v Satterthwaite
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1948 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
300 cases
-
Preston v Preston
...that I would not have awarded so large a sum. On the other hand, in this court, we have to bear in mind Asquith L.J.'s warning in Bellenden -v- Satterthwaite 1948 1 AER, 343 at p.345: "We are here concerned with a judicial discretion, and it is of the essence of such a discretion that on th......
-
G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal)
...therefore the judge has a discretion and they are cases to which the observations of Asquith L.J., as he then was, in Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v. Satterthwaite [1948] 1 All E.R. 343, apply. My attention was called to that case by my noble and learned friend Lord Bridge of Harwich......
-
Gojkovic v Gojkovic
...of judicial discretion. Mr. Jackson has reminded this court of the case of Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v. Satterthwaite [1948] 1 All E.R. 343, and of the words of Asquith, L.J. that it was only where the exercise of a discretion exceeded the generous ambit within which reasonable dis......
-
Re BM (Care Orders)
...42 The phrase “reasonable disagreement” derives from a famous judgment in this court by Asquith LJ, as he then was, in Bellenden (Formerly Sattherthwaite) v Satterthwaite [1948] 1 All ER 143 in which he said:- It is, of course, not enough for the wife to establish that this court might, or ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Child Support on or after Divorce
...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite, [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 (Eng. C.A.). (para. Citing the judgment of Rosenberg JA in Tauber v Tauber,155 Conrad JA further observed that a prima facie case may be suffic......
-
Low- and High-Income Earners; Annual Income over $150,000
...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite, [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 at 345. (para. Applying these principles in Ewing v Ewing, the Alberta Court of Appeal held that the chambers judge had committed four errors. ......
-
Low- and high-income earners; annual income over $150,000
...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite, [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 at 345. (para. 49) Applying these principles in Ewing v Ewing, the Alberta Court of Appeal held that the chambers judge had committed four erro......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite, [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 (Eng. C.A.). (para. Citing the judgment of Rosenberg JA in Tauber v Tauber,167 Conrad JA further observed that a prima facie case may be suffic......
Request a trial to view additional results