Bellenden (orse Satterthwaite) v Satterthwaite

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1948
Year1948
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
323 cases
  • Preston v Preston
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 June 1981
    ...that I would not have awarded so large a sum. On the other hand, in this court, we have to bear in mind Asquith L.J.'s warning in Bellenden -v- Satterthwaite 1948 1 AER, 343 at p.345: "We are here concerned with a judicial discretion, and it is of the essence of such a discretion that on th......
  • G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 April 1985
    ...therefore the judge has a discretion and they are cases to which the observations of Asquith L.J., as he then was, in Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v. Satterthwaite [1948] 1 All E.R. 343, apply. My attention was called to that case by my noble and learned friend Lord Bridge of Harwich......
  • Gojkovic v Gojkovic
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...an exercise of judicial discretion. Mr. Jackson has reminded this court of the case of Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v. Satterthwaite [1948] 1 All E.R. 343, and of the words of Asquith, L.J. that it was only where the exercise of a discretion exceeded the generous ambit within which re......
  • Dufour et Al v Helenair Corporation Ltd et Al
    • St Lucia
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Lucia)
    • 12 February 1996
    ...then the reversal of the order on appeal may be justified." 11The second condition was explained by Asquith L.J. in Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v Satterthwaite (1948) 1 AER 343 at 345 in language which was approved and adopted by the House of Lords in G v G (1985) 2 AER 225 and which......
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1963
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1963 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...Sahai (1879) 2 All 253. 269 Barnhart v. Greenshields (1853) 9 MOO. P.C. 18. 102 Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v. Satterthwaite (1948) 1 All E.R. 343. .241 Blundell v. R. (1905) 1 K.B. 516 183 Blunt v. Blunt (1933) A.C. 517 at 524. 219 Brace v. Calder (1895) 2 Q.B. 255. 111 Bradford Cor......
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite, [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 (Eng. C.A.). (para. Citing the judgment of Rosenberg JA in Tauber v Tauber,155 Conrad JA further observed that a prima facie case may be suffic......
  • Child Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite, [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 (Eng. C.A.). (para. Citing the judgment of Rosenberg JA in Tauber v Tauber,167 Conrad JA further observed that a prima facie case may be suffic......
  • Low- and high-income earners; annual income over $150,000
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2017
    • 29 August 2017
    ...are so high as to “excee[d] the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible”: Bellenden v. Satterthwaite , [1948] 1 All E.R. 343 at 345. (para. 49) Applying these principles in Ewing v. Ewing , the Alberta Court of Appeal held that the chambers judge had committed four e......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT