Bennett v Bennett
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 1952 |
| Year | 1952 |
| Date | 1952 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
62 cases
- Ling Pooi Ming; Ong Ah Mai
-
L v L
...that the jurisdiction of the court to award maintenance to a wife cannot be ousted by any private agreement between the parties; see Bennett v. Bennett (1952 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 249) following Hyman v. Hyman. Such an agreement is unenforceable against the wife as being cont......
- Sutton v Sutton
-
Marshall v N M Financial Management Ltd
...consideration", or "the whole or substantially the whole consideration" for the promise: for the last formulation see Bennett v Bennett [1952] 1 KB 249 at p. 261 per Denning LJ. 25 I doubt that there is any real difference between these different formulations, so long as it is recognised (i......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Illegality
...the Criminal 310 Amoco Australia Pty v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Co , [1975] AC 561 (PC). 311 See, for example, Bennett v Bennett , [1952] 1 KB 249 (CA) (separation agreement in which the consideration flowing from the wife was an unenforceable undertaking not to invoke the jurisdiction......
-
Statute-barred cohabitant claimants in Barbados
...the limitation period; 18 and where, as in 12 Simmonds v. Simmonds [1955] 2 All E.R. 481 at 492. 13 Ibid. See also Bennett v. Bennett [1952] 1 K.B. 249, where the delay arose from the fact that the registrar erroneously struck out the wife's application for maintenance for herself and the s......