Bennett v Marshall

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date15 December 1937
Date15 December 1937
Year1938

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Harvey (Inspector of Taxes) v Breyfogle
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 April 1953
    ...in Case V covers employment ( Colquhoun v. Brooks [1889] 14 A.C., 493, Foulsham v. Pickles [1925] A.C., 458, Bennett v. Marshall [1938] 1 K.B., 591, per Lord Greene M.R. 600-1). But to fall within Case V the "possession", the employment, must be outside the United Kingdom, which means entir......
  • Bray (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Colenbrander
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 April 1953
    ...in Case V covers employment (Colquhoun v. Brooks, (1889) 14 A.C. 493,(1)Foulsham v. Pickles, [1925] A.C. 458,(2)Bennet v. Marshall, [1938] 1 K.B. 591,(3) per Sir Wilfrid Greene, M.R., at pages 600-1). But to fall within Case V the "possession", the employment, must be outside the United Kin......
  • Singh v Mortimer
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • G.H (Trinidad) Ltd v The Board of Inland Revenue
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Tax Appeal Board (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 14 March 1985
    ...Eccott, (1924) 10 T.C. 111; 132 LT 173. (7) Wilcock v. Pinto & Co., 9 T.C. 111; [1925] 1 K.B. 30; 69 Sol. Jo. 178. (8) Bennett v. Marshal 22 T.C. 73; [1938] 1 K.B. 591; [1938] 1 All E.R. 93. (9) British Sugar Manufacturers v. Harris (1938) 21 T.C. 528; revsd. [1938] 2 K.B. 220; [1938] 1 All......
  • Get Started for Free