Benson v Baldwyn
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 19 May 1739 |
| Date | 19 May 1739 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 26 E.R. 377
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
Benson
and
Baldwyn
[598] Case 274.-benson . baldwyn.(!) May the 19th, 1739. A bill may be brought for rent in this court, where the remedy at law is lost or becomes very difficult, and this court will relieve on the foundation of payment for a length of time. Lord Chancellor. Where a man is intitled to a rent out of lands, and thro' process of time the remedy at law is lost, or become very difficult, this court has interfered and given...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Archbishop of Dublin v Coote and Lord Trimleston
...Reported post. Duke of Bridgewater v. EdwardsENR 6 Bro. P. C. 368. Duke of Leeds v. New RadnorENR 2 Bro. C. C. 518. Benson v. BaldwinENR 1 Atk. 598. Manly v. HawkinsUNK 1 Dr. & Wal. 363. Holder v. ChamburyENR 3 P. Wms. 255. Duke of Leeds v. ParnellENR 1 Ves. sen. 171. Cocks v. FoleyENR 1 Ve......
-
Brady v Fitzgerald
...Bridgewater v. EdmondsENR 6 Bro. P. C. 368. North v. StaffordENR 3 P. Wms. 148. Holder v. ChamburyENR 3 P. Wms. 255. Benson v. BaldwynENR 1 Atk. 598. Duke of Leeds v. Powell 1 Ves. 171. The Duke of Leeds v. the Corporation of New RadnorENR 2 Bro. C. C. 338. Havergill v. HareENR Cro. Jac. 51......
-
Robinson against Hardcastle and Others
...the whole was held void. In 2 Wils. 337, there (a) Dom. Proc. 1714. 1 Bro. P. C. 470. K. B. xxix.-5* 138 ROBINSON V. HARDCASTLBHopkins v. Hopkins, 1 Atk. 598. In Papillon v. Voice (6)2 a decree was made one way as to the money to be laid out in the purchase of land, and another as to the la......
-
Whitfield v Fausset
...his action before he had the deed, and not like the cases where the court could help by imparlances. In White v. Montgomery, Mich. 17 G. 21 Atk. 598 ; 2 Brown, 61.) But I must distinguish on this part between the Faussets, all claiming to be purchasers for valuable consideration without not......
Get Started for Free