Beyts v Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd : Caught Short on Data Protection and Privacy
Pages | 411-417 |
Author | |
DOI | 10.3366/elr.2017.0437 |
Published date | 01 September 2017 |
Date | 01 September 2017 |
Small claims
Whether or not Ms Beyts would subscribe to the accolade of “environment activist” awarded to her by
It was uncontroversial that the digital photograph taken by the Trump employee was personal data and that the defenders were the data controller in terms of section 1 of the 1998 Act. The defenders had not, however, registered as such, or more specifically, notified the Information Commissioner of their data processing, as required by section 17 of the 1998 Act, which section 21 states to be an offence. Ms Beyts therefore invoked section 13 which allows for damages to be awarded to individuals who suffer distress due to contravention of the 1998 Act. Reference was made also to the Court of Appeal decision in
To continue reading
Request your trial