BH Oon and Others; Government of State of Penang and Another
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1971 |
| Year | 1971 |
| Date | 1971 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Ritzland Investment Pte Ltd v Grace Management & Consultancy Services Pte Ltd
...28 LJEx 306 (refd) Goh Chok Tong v Chee Soon Juan [2003] 3 SLR (R) 32; [2003] 3 SLR 32 (folld) Government of State of Penang v BH Onn [1971] 2 MLJ 235 (refd) Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk [1992] 1 AC 478 (folld) Harrison v Wells [1967] 1 QB 263 (refd) Harvey v Pratt [......
-
Ritzland Investment Pte Ltd v Grace Management & Consultancy Services Pte Ltd
...from denying the title of the landlord so long as the tenant is still in possession (Government of the State of Penang v BH Onn & Ors [1971] 2 MLJ 235 at 237 (Privy Council) on appeal from Malaysia) and that he is no longer estopped once he surrenders possession whether upon determination o......
-
Credit Corporation (Malaysia) Berhad v Syarikat Poh Kim Seng (M) Sdn. Bhd. & Five Ors., 14-02-1996
...without resort to it (Sime Darby & Co. Ltd v Official Assignee [1927] 1 MC 116 PC; Government of State of Penang & Anor. v B.H Oon & Ors [1971] 2 MLJ 235 PC). We are not concerned with onus of proof. What we are concerned here is whether the Plaintiff had 11 5 10 15 20 25 adduced evidence f......