BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
Year1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Fujitsu Services Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 21 March 2014
    ...where it was a " special indirect or consequential loss." 74 Reference was also made by both parties to BHP Petroleum Ltd & ors v British Steel Plc [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 583. There the exclusion clause was again materially different to clause 20.7. It provided that there would be no liabili......
  • China Shipbuilding Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kabukishi Kaisha (Saikyo, Seta Maru, Suma)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 January 2000
    ...in the judgment: Andrews Bros (Bournemouth) Ltd v Singer & Co LtdELR [1934] 1 KB 17. BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel plcUNK [1999] 2 All ER (Comm) 544. Harland & Wolff Ltd v Lakeport Navigation Co Panama SAUNK [1974] 1 Ll Rep 301. Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport LtdELR ......
  • HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 2001
    ... ... ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 387 at 397/8 and BHP Petroleum Ltd v. British Steel Plc [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep 277 (a limitation rather than an exclusion ... ...
  • Scottish Power Uk Plc v BP Exploration Operating Company Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 25 September 2015
    ...as caught by the exclusion. 189 The first and principal authority cited for this proposition is a statement of Rix J in BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel plc [1999] 2 All ER (Comm) 544; [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 583. In that case a contract for the supply of steel for a gas pipeline contained a ......
  • Get Started for Free