Bhullar v Bhullar

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Jonathan Parker,Lord Justice Brooke,Lord Justice Schiemann
Judgment Date31 March 2003
Neutral Citation[2003] EWCA Civ 424
Docket NumberCase No: A3/2002/1085/1085A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date31 March 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
97 cases
  • O'Donnell v Shanahan
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 August 2008
    ...conclusion on the application of the no conflict rule. 210 In support of his submissions, Mr Clutterbuck relied on Re Bhullar Bros [2003] EWCA Civ 424, [2003] BCLC 24. In that case, two directors of a company, Bhullar Bros Ltd, acquired, through the medium of another company they controlle......
  • Mark Simon Reynolds (as Liquidator of CSB 123 Ltd) v Caroline Stanbury
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 September 2021
    ...than as a director in making a secret profit is no answer to a claim by the company to recover the profits. Thus in Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241, this Court held that directors of the company were liable for profits resulting from the acquisition of a property neighbouring that of th......
  • Animal Concerns Research & Education Society v Tan Boon Kwee
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 20 January 2011
    ...Ltd. [1972] 1 WLR 443 at 451 and the English Court of Appeal decision of Mohan Singh Bhullar & ors v Inderjit Singh Bhullar & anor [2003] EWCA Civ 424 at [41]), and we see no reason to adopt it in the context of the common law duties of a clerk of works. Consequently, the knowledge reasonab......
  • Peter Dooley v Anthony Carmelos Norris
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 31 March 2021
    ...which might conflict with their fiduciary duties. b) As to external matters, it is explained by the Court of Appeal in Bhullar and others v Bhullar and another [2003] EWCA Civ 424, [2003] 2 BCLC 241, that: “whether the ‘reasonable men looking at the facts would think there was a real sens......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Unfair Prejudice: Flexible But Unpredictable?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 19 August 2021
    ...para. 71 and Euro Accessories, para. 67. 2 See Re Tobian Properties [2013] BCC 98, Arden LJ, para. 22. 3 See e.g. Bhullar v. Bhullar [2003] BCC 711, also Davies v. Ford [2020] EWHC 686 (Ch), Adam Johnson QC in the context of an insolvent Originally published 21 Jun 2021. The content of this......
  • Unfair Prejudice: Flexible But Unpredictable?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 19 August 2021
    ...para. 71 and Euro Accessories, para. 67. 2 See Re Tobian Properties [2013] BCC 98, Arden LJ, para. 22. 3 See e.g. Bhullar v. Bhullar [2003] BCC 711, also Davies v. Ford [2020] EWHC 686 (Ch), Adam Johnson QC in the context of an insolvent Originally published 21 Jun 2021. The content of this......
8 books & journal articles
  • RECONFIGURING THE NO CONFLICT RULE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...51, per Lord Herschell. 15Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v CooleyWLR[1972] 1 WLR 443, [1972] 2 All ER 162; Bhullar v BhullarUNK[2003] 2 BCLC 241. 16 At common law, it is not clear whether, if the company decides not to proceed following disclosure, whether that disclosure suffices t......
  • SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Sdn Bhd v Masato Saito [2013] 9 MLJ 729; and Avel Consultants Sdn Bhd v Mohd Zain Yusof [1985] 2 MLJ 209 for misuse of information. 142 [2003] 2 BCLC 241. 143 [2009] 2 BCLC 666. In this case, the principle in Aas v Benham [1891] 2 Ch 244 was distinguished on the basis that a director fiduci......
  • NAVIGATING THE MAZE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...32 Syd L Rev 389 at 394. 32[1996] 3 WLR 1051. 33[2009] 3 SLR(R) 109 at [142]–[145]. 34[1967] 2 AC 46. 35 See, for example, Re Bhullar[2003] BCC 711 at [272], per Parker LJ. 36Ng Eng Ghee v Mamata Kapildev Dave[2009] 3 SLR(R) 109 at [143]. Other reasons offered by the court related to the ge......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...Samtani[2014] 1 SLR 245 at [117]. 77Then Khek Koon v Arjun Permanand Samtani[2014] 1 SLR 245 at [116]. 78 See Bhullar v Bhullar[2003] EWCA Civ 424 at [41]: The anxiety which the appellants plainly felt as to the propriety of purchasing the property through Silvercrest without first disclosi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT