Bickel v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1984 |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Aubergine Enterprises Ltd v Lakewood International Ltd
...a plain reference to what is required by the clause 4.18.3 of the lease, namely "prior written consent". Cf. Bickel v. Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Limited [1984] 1 All ER 657, per Warner J.. It is not, however, a reference confining the prior written consent to an unconditional consent......
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
... ... to rescind arose it was subject to the return of the deposit.In Bickel & Ors v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd 5 a lease prohibited ... ...
-
The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit (Pte) Ltd
...extend to taking further steps after consent had been refused: at [32] to [42] .] Bickel v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 795; [1984] 1 All ER 657 (refd) Brauer&Co (Great Britain) Ltd v James Clark (Brush Materials) Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 497 (refd) Commonwealth Bank of Aust......
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
...in the transaction. 64.To support the above submissions, the first defendant relies on Bickel v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 795, Lipmans Wallpaper Ltd v Mason & Hodghton, Ltd [1969] 1 Ch 20 and Lehmann v McArthur [1868] 3 AC 464. In Lehmann v McArthur the court conside......
Get Started for Free