Biggs et Al v London Loan & Savings Company et Al London Loan & Savings Company v Brickenden et Al
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1934 |
| Year | 1934 |
| Date | 1934 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
82 cases
-
Quality Assurance Management Asia Pte Ltd v Zhang Qing
...and remoteness did not readily apply when assessing equitable compensation; Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Company of Canada[1934] 3 DLR 465 (‘the Brickenden principle’). But even in equity the test of liability for equitable compensation was whether the loss would have been suffered bu......
-
Stafford v Attorney-General
...citing Gilbert v Shanahan [1998] 3 NZLR 528 (CA). This represents a relaxation of the rule in Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR 465 (PC), espoused by Lord Thankerston at 469, in which fiduciary defendants were precluded from arguing that even if a plaintiff had been correct......
-
Swindle v Harrison
...in the absence of fraud. Moreover, He approved Causon Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & CoUNK ((1991) 85 DLR 129Brickenden v London Loan & Savings CoUNK ((1934) 3 DLR 465, 469), they were liable to restore Mrs Harrison financially to the position she was in when their breach of duty occurred......
-
Murad and Another v Al-Saraj and Another
...Ltd. v. Southend United Football Club Ltd [1988] 1 WLR 1256, esp. at 1264B-C. 105 In the Privy Council case of Brickenden v. London Loan and Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR 465 a solicitor acting for the loan company had a personal interest in certain loans made to a customer of the company which, ......
Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
-
Credit Advisers, Consumer Credit and Equitable Fiduciary Obligations
...sought. Similarly, the facts do not engage the con-tentious approach to causation associated with Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR465, 469 (the Board). See generally Matthew Conaglen, ‘Brickenden’ in Simone Degeling and Jason NE Varuhas (eds), Equitable Compensation and Di......
-
Equity and Trusts
...stands at the very core of the fiduciary relationship. First, it must be noted that the decision of Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co[1934] 3 DLR 465 has come under trenchant criticism by commentators and subsequent cases (helpfully summarised in Fiduciary Loyalty at pp 90–94). Second, ......
-
Case Note
...see also Tan Ruo Yu, “Causation in Equitable Compensation: Then Khek Koon v Arjun Permanand Samtani” (2014) 26 SAcLJ 724 at 737. 63 [1934] 3 DLR 465. 64 Beyonics Technology Ltd v Goh Chan Peng [2016] 4 SLR 472 at [137]. 65 Beyonics Technology Ltd v Goh Chan Peng [2016] 4 SLR 472 at [132]–[1......
-
RECONCEPTUALISING FIDUCIARY REGULATION IN ACTUAL CONFLICTS.
...Moody v Cox [1917] 2 Ch 71, 91 (Scrutton LJ) ('Moody'). (51) See Stewart (n 34) 690 (Foster J). (52) Ibid 709. (53) Ibid 711. (54) [1934] 3 DLR 465, 469 (Lord Thankerton) (Privy (55) Stewart (n 34) 712-13 (Foster J). (56) Ibid 713-14. (57) Ibid 714. (58) See Matthew Conaglen, 'Brickenden' i......
Get Started for Free
