Biggs et Al v London Loan & Savings Company et Al London Loan & Savings Company v Brickenden et Al
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1934 |
| Date | 1934 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
91 cases
- Tenji v Henneberry & Associates Pty Ltd (No 2)
- Tenji v Henneberry & Associates Pty Ltd
-
Quality Assurance Management Asia Pte Ltd v Zhang Qing
...and remoteness did not readily apply when assessing equitable compensation; Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Company of Canada[1934] 3 DLR 465 (‘the Brickenden principle’). But even in equity the test of liability for equitable compensation was whether the loss would have been suffered bu......
-
Gwembe Valley Development Company Ltd v Koshy and Another
...of his interest in the transaction. As was said by Lord Thankerton in the Privy Council in Brickenden v. London Loan & Savings Co (1934) 3 DLR 465 at 469: "When a party, holding a fiduciary relationship, commits a breach of his duty by non-disclosure of material facts, which his constituent......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 books & journal articles
-
NAVIGATING THE MAZE
...Ltd v Zhang Qing[2013] 3 SLR 631 at [37]–[38]. 77Quality Assurance Management Asia Pte Ltd v Zhang Qing[2013] 3 SLR 631 at [39]–[41]. 78[1934] 3 DLR 465. The Brickenden rule was first mentioned in local jurisprudence by Quentin Loh J in Then Khek Khoon v Arjun Permanand Samtani[2012] 2 SLR ......
-
AN ACCOUNT OF ACCOUNTS
...and Tito v Waddell (No 2)[1977] Ch 106. 59Nocton v Lord Ashburton[1914] AC 932 at 956. 60Nocton v Lord Ashburton[1914] AC 932 at 958. 61[1934] 3 DLR 465. 62Brickenden v London Loans & Savings Co[1934] 3 DLR 465 at 469. See also Magnus v Queensland National Bank(1888) 37 Ch D 466 at 472. 63 ......
-
Credit Advisers, Consumer Credit and Equitable Fiduciary Obligations
...sought. Similarly, the facts do not engage the con-tentious approach to causation associated with Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR465, 469 (the Board). See generally Matthew Conaglen, ‘Brickenden’ in Simone Degeling and Jason NE Varuhas (eds), Equitable Compensation and Di......
-
Case Note
...Samtani [2014] 1 SLR 245 The brickenden Rule in singapore The controversial rule in Brickenden V London Loan & Savings Company Of Canada [1934] 3 Dlr 465 was recently introduced into the local jurisprudence on equitable compensation for breach of fiduciary duty. In then Khek Koon V Arjun Pe......
Request a trial to view additional results