Bigos v Bousted

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Year1951
Date1951

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...by the English Court of Appeal in Tribe v Tribe[1996] Ch 107, where the rigour of the earlier (also English) decision in Bigos v Bousted[1951] 1 All ER 92 was mitigated by emphasising only voluntariness — as opposed (in addition) to genuineness — of repentance. 9.85 In the Singapore High Co......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...English Court of Appeal in Tribe v Tribe[1995] 3 WLR 913, which mitigated the rigour of the earlier English decision of Bigos v Bousted[1951] 1 All ER 92 by emphasising only voluntariness — as opposed to genuineness — of repentance (see generally [130] to [140]). 9.78 However, where the per......
  • Illegality
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 August 2020
    ...illustration, 5 Allen v Rescous , above note 3. 6 Byron v Tremaine (1898), 31 NSR 425 (SC), aff’d 29 SCR 445. 7 Bigos v Bousted , [1951] 1 All ER 92 (KB) [ Bigos ]. 8 United Dominion Promotion Sales Inc v Shaw (1957), 119 CCC 380 (NB Co Ct). 9 Fores v Johnes (1802), 4 Esp 97, 170 ER 654 (Ni......
  • Lecture - ONES DAY PROFESSORSHIP OF COMMERCIAL LAW LECTURE 2019 – “THE STATE OF ILLEGALITY”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, January - December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [2009] UKHL 39; [2009] 1 AC 1391 at [25]. 27 See Taylor v Bowers (1876) 1 QBD 291. 28 Bigos v Bousted [1951] 1 All ER 92. 29 Tribe v Tribe [1996] Ch 107 at 135, per Millett LJ. 30 As had been recognised by the Court of Appeal in Patel v Mirza [2014] EWCA Civ 1......
  • Get Started for Free