Black & Decker Inc. v Flymo Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 21 November 1990 |
| Date | 21 November 1990 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
24 cases
-
JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
...Eady, L.JJ. considered. (5) Berd v. LovelaceENR(1577), Cary 62; 21 E.R. 33, referred to. (6) Black & Decker Inc. v. Flymo Ltd., [1991] 1 W.L.R. 753; [1991] 3 All E.R. 158, dicta of Hoffmann J. distinguished. (7) Bolton v. Liverpool Corp.ENR(1833), 1 My. & K. 88; 39 E.R. 614, referred to. (8......
- Barbara Lim Cheng Sim v Uptown Alliance (M) Sdn Bhd (No 2)
-
ISTIL Group Inc. v Zahoor
...Ltd v. Fitzroy Robinson Partnership [1987] 1 WLR 1027, 1044, per Slade LJ accepting argument to this effect. In Black & Decker Inc v. Flymo Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 753 Hoffmann J said that once a privileged document was disclosed the question was one of admissibility, and not privilege. 90 Second,......
- Bourns Inc. v Raychem Corporation and Another (No.3)
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...[1987] 2SCR 398 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93Bell vR [1985] FCA454 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251Black &Decker v Flymo[1991] 1 WLR753 . . . 337Blagojevic and Jokic (Case No. IT-0260-T)Decision on Prosecution’s Motion forAdmission of Expert Statements, 7November 2003. . . ......
-
ADMISSIBILITY, PRIVILEGE AND THE EXPUNGING OF EVIDENCE
...Disclosure in Civil Proceedings”(1991) 107 LQR 99. 26 As a general proposition, what Hoffmann J said it Black & Decker Inc v Flymo Ltd[1991] 3 All ER 158 at 159 is true: “It is not possible to assert a right to refuse to disclose in respect of a document which has already been disclosed. On......