Blake against Foster
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1800 |
Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Rawson v Grogan
...Pleas. Coram MONAHAN, C. J., MORRIS and LAWSON, JJ. RAWSON and GROGAN Doe v. SmytheENR 4 M. & S. 497. Blake v. ForsterENR 8 T. R. 487. Duchess of Kingston's CaseUNK 2 Sm. L. C. 755. Walton v. WaterhouseENR 1 Wms. Saund. 418. Balls v. WestwoodENR 2 Camp. 11. Cuthbertson v. IrvineENR 4 H. & N......
-
Stewart v The Marquis of Conyngham
...v. Smith Ambl. 368. Helps v. HerefordENR 2 B. & ald. 243. Christmas v. Oliver 10 B. & Cr. 181. Weale v. Lower Pol. 64. Blake v. FosterENR 8 T. R. 487. Cole v.Sewell 4 Dr. 7amp; War. 14. Wyche v. East India CompanyENR 3 P. Wms. 309. Jessop v. KingUNK 2 Ball & B. 94. Doe v. HuttonENR 3 Bos. &......
-
Cuthbertson v Irving
...lease : Pa,r%ei v. Manning (7 T R 537) A reversion in fee by estoppel may be defeated by the owner acquiring the legal fee. Blake v Fostei (8 T. R 487) shews that where any legal interest, however small, passes by the demise, there is no estoppel. Goiildvimth v. Knights (LI M. & W 337), 2 W......
-
Mary Weld v Baxter
...the estoppel was not relied on. A lessee cannot plead in bar that the lessor had only an equitable estate in the premises Blake v. Fostei (8 T. R 487). He also referred to The Pioprietors of the, GVtws Key^ Bridge v Rawhtigs (3 Bmg. N. C. 71), Beckett v. Bradley (1 Man. & G 999), Bouman v. ......
Request a trial to view additional results