Blay v Pollard and Morris

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1930
Year1930
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
117 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF PROOF IN CIVIL LITIGATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...This can be understood from the function of pleadings as stated in The “Ohm Mariana” ex “Peony”:42 In Blay v Pollard and Morris[1930] 1 KB 628, the trial judge decided the case on issues not raised in the pleadings and on appeal the Court of Appeal held that he was not entitled to do that. ......
  • Preliminary sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 16 Preliminary sections
    • 11 July 2016
    ...419, 433 Bisichi Tin Co. Ltd. v. Okonkwo (1961) N.N.L.R. 60……….........................................….……..280 Blay v. Pollard & Anor. (1930) 1 K.B 628, 634………………..............................................…….797 Board in Bank of New South Wales v. O’Connor, 1889 14 A.C. p. 273…….............
  • Table of Cases
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 16 Preliminary sections
    • 11 July 2016
    ...419, 433 Bisichi Tin Co. Ltd. v. Okonkwo (1961) N.N.L.R. 60……….........................................….……..280 Blay v. Pollard & Anor. (1930) 1 K.B 628, 634………………..............................................…….797 Board in Bank of New South Wales v. O’Connor, 1889 14 A.C. p. 273…….............
  • Cases reported in 1988 Part II
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1988. Part II Nigerian Supreme Court Cases 1988 Part II Preliminary Sections
    • 27 November 2022
    ...Ltd. (1960) All E.R. 314. 430 Besseler, Weachter Glover & Co. v. Smith Dervent Coal Co. (1938) 1 K.B. 408. 430 Blay v. Pollard & Anor. (1930) 1 K.B. 628, 634. 134 Bowaje v. Adediwura (1976) 6 S.C. 143. 93 Bowaji v. Adediwura (1976) 6 S.C. 143 92 Boyle v. Sacker (1888) 39 CHD 349 C.A 92 Bris......
  • Get Started for Free