Board of Education v Rice and Others
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 06 April 1911 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1911] UKHL J0406-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 06 April 1911 |
[1911] UKHL J0406-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants, as well on Thursday the 23d and Friday the 24th days of February last, as on Friday the 3d day of March last, upon the Petition and Appeal of the Board of Education, whose Offices are at Whitehall, in the County of London, praying, That the matter of the Orders set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, two Orders of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st of April 1910, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Orders might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Reverend the Honourable William Talbot Rice, Arthur Francis Eden, Frederick Poole Wood, and Hugh Bellingham, the Managers of the Swansea Oxford Street (Church of England) School, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the said Respondents, but not being called on, and due consideration being had this day of what was offered for the said Appellants:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Orders of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st day of April 1910, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same are hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
... ... of public servant - Police disciplinary proceedings - Findings of board of inquiry furnished to adjudicating officer but not to accused police ... police officers, leaving the Commissioner of Police to appoint all others. Their Lordships cannot accede to this argument. Under article 140 the ... in Board of Education v. Rice F23 down to the decision of their Lordships' Board in Ceylon ... ...
-
The State (Cuthbert) v Minister for Defence
...(1) Before Sullivan, C.J., Murnaghan, Geoghegan, O'Byrne andBlack JJ. (1) 2 P. D. 203. (2) L. R. 1 Q. B. 433: (3) [1910] 2 K. B. 165; [1911] A. C. 179. (4) [1942] 1 All E. R. 56. (5) [1941] I. R. 569. (6) [1915] A. C. 120. (7) [1943] I. R. 581. (8) [1935] I. R. 70. (9) [1935] I. R. 128. (10......
-
The Institute of Jamaica v The Industrial Disputes Tribunal, Beecher (Coleen)
...from the House of Lords and the Privy Council on this aspect of jurisdiction thus at pages 235–236: "Again in Board of Education v. Rice [1911] A.C. 179; [1911-13] All ER. Rep. 36 this House quashed the board's decision and issued a mandamus on the ground that it had not determined the ques......
-
Phillip v. Whitecourt General Hospital et al., (2004) 359 A.R. 259 (QB)
...a fair opportunity 'for correcting or contradicting any relevant statement prejudicial to their views'. Board of Education v. Rice [[1911] A.C. 179 (H.L.)], at p. 182; Local Government Board v. Arlidge , supra, at pp. 133 and 141." [108] Kane was amongst the authorities cited in I.W.A. [see......
-
Courts 2
...to the Tribunal if the laid down procedure for bringing such proceedings had not been complied with - See: Board of Education v. Rice (1911) A.C. 179; Walter v. Eton R.D.C. (1950) 8 All E.R. 588 and Goldensack v. Shore (1950) I. K.B. 709.” - Per Sulu-Gambari, J.C.A., in Okoroafor v. The Mis......
-
Natural Justice and Disciplinary Cases in Britain and France
...CASES UNITED KINGDOM Bagg’s Case (1616) 11 Co. Rep. 93 Barnard v. NationalDock LabourBoard, [1953] 2 QB 18 Board of Education v. Rice, [1911] AC 179 Breen v. AmalgamatedEngineering Union, [1917] 1 All ER 1148 (CA) Brighton Corporation v. Parry (1972), 70 LGR 576 Central Council for Educatio......
-
Fiduciary Government: Decentring Property and Taxpayers' Interests
...of local government in isolation. I CASES CITED Belcher v. Reading Corporation [1949] 2 All ER 969.Board of Education v. Rice [1911] AC 179.Boardman v. Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46.Bromley LBC v. GLC [1982] 1 All ER 129. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 30 US (5 pet.) 1 (1931).Cummgs v. Btrkenhead Corpo......
-
Wrongs and Remedies in Administrative Law
...Shoosmith (1007: 1 06 L.T. 762: this. howcver, was E cise of staiutory ccrtioriri, not common law certiorari. Board of Education v. Rice [1911] A.C. 179. 200 THE MODERN LAW REVIEW VOL. 15 This situation may arise where a planning authority refuses a property owner permission to develop his ......