Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1957
Date1957
Year1957
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
973 cases
21 firm's commentaries
74 books & journal articles
  • Government liability in negligence.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 1, April 2008
    • 1 April 2008
    ...Act 2007 (UK) c 19, s 1(4)(b). (261) See Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia (2005) 148 FCR 446. (262) [1957] 2 All ER 118. (263) See, eg, Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s (264) Ipp Report, above n 8, 151. (265) Harlow would deny the need for hindsight: see Carol Ha......
  • MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE AND PATIENT AUTONOMY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...The UK, in a recent landmark decision, departed from its earlier jurisprudence applying Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee[1957] 1 WLR 582 to the duty to inform. However, Singapore continues to apply the Bolam test. This article argues that in light of the recent UK decision rejec......
  • THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INTERESTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...the law on the disclosure of medical risks in the UK was, at least in theory, governed by Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee[1957] 1 WLR 582 and the majority decision in Sidaway, under which the question of whether a doctor ought to have disclosed a risk is to be determined by wha......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Law of the Manor - 2nd Edition Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2012
    ...Ltd [2010] UKSC 35, [2011] 1 AC 380, [2010] 3 WLR 654, [2010] 3 All ER 975 9.3, 11.7, 24.1 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582, [1957] 2 All ER 118, 101 SJ 357 4.4 Borell v Dann (1843) 2 Hare 440, 67 ER 181 9.5 Bowser v Maclean (1860) 3 de Gex, Fish & J 415, 45 ER ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT