Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judgment Date | 1957 |
| Year | 1957 |
| Date | 1957 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
927 cases
- Foo Fio Na v Dr Soo Fook Mun
-
Mohammed Adil v General Medical Council
... ... tribunal (‘the Tribunal’), which is a committee" of the respondent, the General Medical Council (‘the GMC\xE2\x80" ... consultant colorectal surgeon at the Chesterfield Hospital in November 2019. The Tribunal concluded that three of ... standard to be applied should be lower than that in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1975] 1 WLR 583 ... ...
-
(1) The "Wembridge Claimants" and Others v (1) Martin Paul Winter* (First Defendant) (2) East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service and Another (Second Defendant) Austin
...be high and/or such that it incorporates the Bolam test in a reference to the well-known test for clinical negligence in Bolam -v- Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582". 7 In addition to the issues of pure law, there are important issues of application of the law to the fac......
-
Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
...educational needs and the authority would be vicariously liable if they were in breach, though the test in Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 W.L.R. 582 would apply to them. These were matters which needed to be 58In the Hampshire case, it was held that the defendant aut......
Get Started for Free
11 firm's commentaries
-
Deliberate, fraudulent, negligent diagnosis of mental illness and an absence of consent on admission to a mental health ward: Stewart v Hames
...and territory 106 Above n 1, at [601]. 107 Above n 1, at [603]. Bowden DCJ citing Bolam v Friern Barnet Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 BMLR 1; [1957] 2 All ER 118; [1957] 1 WLR 108 Above n 1, at [605]. 109 Above n 1, at [610]. 110 Above n 1, at [626]. 111 Above n 1, at [614]. 112 Ab......
-
Invitation To Treat? Supreme Court Clarifies The Professional Practice Test
...This will be referred to for shorthand as the "professional practice test", as set down by McNair J in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 ("Bolam"). The test is consistent with Hunter v Hanley 1955 SC 200 ("Hunter v Hanley"). A qualification to this test is found ......
-
Robots To The Rescue: Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare In Malaysia
...24 Ziad Obermeyer and EJ Emanuel, "Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine" (29 September 2016). 25 [1957] 1 WLR 582. 26 As affirmed in Zulhasnimar Hasan Basri & Anor v Dr Kuppu Velumani P & Ors [2017] 8 CLJ 605. The Bolam test applies subject to the qualif......
-
Robots To The Rescue: Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare In Malaysia
...24 Ziad Obermeyer and EJ Emanuel, "Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine" (29 September 2016). 25 [1957] 1 WLR 582. 26 As affirmed in Zulhasnimar Hasan Basri & Anor v Dr Kuppu Velumani P & Ors [2017] 8 CLJ 605. The Bolam test applies subject to the qualif......
Get Started for Free
74 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...Public Redacted Version,10 July2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Bolam v Friern Hospital ManagementCommittee [1957]1 WLR 582,QB . . . 103, 111Bourjaily vUnited States 483US 171 . . . . . . .284Boyle v Wiseman (1855) 10 Ex 647, 156 ER 598. . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
-
A Different Ball Game—Why the Nature of Consent in Contact Sports Undermines a Unitary Approach
...a reasonablepractitioner, and to follow usual industry practice—the so-called Bolam test (Bolamv Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118).105 This is a simplification: the test, as established in The Wagon Mound (No. 2), OverseasTankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship [19......
-
Chapter 10. Negligence
...his duty of care. See also Imbree v McNeilly [2008] HCA 40 at [69], per Gummow, Hayne and Kiefel JJ. 189 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 at 586–587, per McNair J; Chin Keow v Government of Malaysia [1967] 1 WLR 813; George Wimpey & Co Ltd v Poole (1984) 27 ......
-
Chapter 6: The Interaction between the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and Self-Regulation: The Case of Codes of Conduct
1
...P. and R. Van der Horst , Self-Regulation Practices in SANCO Policy Areas (Final Report, 2008). Verbruggen PWJBolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582. M Griffiths, ‘Unfair Commercial Practices. A New Regime’ (2007) 12(6) Communications Law 198. 54 Twigg-Flesner et al. ......
Get Started for Free
