Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE GROSS,Lord Justice Gross
Judgment Date09 November 2010
Neutral Citation[2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm)
Docket NumberCase No: 2008 FOLIO 482
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Date09 November 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
42 cases
  • Mr Amjad Rihan v Ernst & Young Global Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 17 April 2020
    ...sued on as a cause. The accumulation of events may take place over time. 782 The defendants say Gross LJ's observation in Borealis AB v. Geogas Trading [2011] 1 Lloyds Rep 482, at [44] ff, approving a statement in the then current (19 th) edition of Clerk & Lindsell (“in order to comprise ......
  • Mueller Europe Ltd v Central Roofing (south Wales) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 22 February 2013
    ...is or remains an effective cause is a question of fact. I gratefully adopt the summary of principle provided by Gross LJ in Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2011] 1 Lloyds LR 482 at [43–47]. What emerges from his summary, and the authorities to which he referred, is that the question to be......
  • Hi-Lite Electrical Ltd v Wolseley Uk Ltd Dab Pumps Spa (Third Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 31 August 2011
    ...the intervention foreseeable? Is the conduct of the third party wholly independent of the defendant…?" 205 As Gross LJ stated in Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 at [42] to [47] the following principles can be derived from previous decisions in relation to causation: (1) Tha......
  • Playboy Club London Ltd and Others v Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro Spa
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 29 July 2014
    ...loss was caused by the customer's non-payment. 57 The test is whether a supervening cause obliterates the first cause: Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep 482 per Gross LJ at paragraphs 44 and 104. One way of testing that is through the lens of scope of duty. The issue is w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Commercial Contracts Bulletin - February 2014
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 3 March 2014
    ...EWCA Civ 1702 The Court of Appeal recently used the five key principles detailed in the case of Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm) to establish whether there had been a break in the chain of causation that resulted in a loss for one party to a contract. In the first ins......
  • Chain of Causation: New Intervening Acts Revisited
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 22 November 2010
    ...a contaminant had been introduced: the head of loss was not too remote to recover. Further reading: Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm) This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to Law-......
  • Commercial Court Reviews Law On Breaking The Chain Of Causation, Mitigation And Remoteness Of Damage
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 28 January 2011
    ...AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm) Dispute G sold a cargo of butane to B to be used as feedstock by B in its plastics production plant. The butane was contaminated with fluorides, which cracked during processing to form hydrofluoric acid, which in turn triggered a pH alarm at th......
2 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT LAW IN COMMONWEALTH COUNTRIES: UNIFORMITY OR DIVERGENCE?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...349; [2010] EWCA Civ 7 at [43]. See also The Amer Energy [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep 293 at [17]–[18]; Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm) at [48]; The Sylvia [2010] EWHC 542 (Comm); [2010] 2 Lloyd's Rep 81 at [40]–[48]; Ispat Indurstries Ltd v Western Bulk Pte Ltd [2011] EWHC ......
  • CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, January 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...The Kelvin Shipping Co v The Canadian Pacific Railway Co 1928 SC (HL) 21, 26 (Viscount Haldane); Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep 482, 488 [43] (Gross LJ) ('Borealis'). Cf Medlin (n 10) 22 (McHugh J). See also Bridge, 'Mitigation of Damages in Contract and the Meaning of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT