Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Company v Ansell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1875 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
129 cases
-
Doucet and Dauphinee v. Spielo Manufacturing Incorporated and Manship,
...engagement be by the year or otherwise: Smith's Law of Master and Servant , 4th ed., p. 220; Boston Deep Sea Fishing Co. v. Ansell , 39 Ch. D. 339. If he retains the servant in his employment for any considerable time after discovering his fault, that is condonation, and he cannot afte......
-
Tele2 International Card Company SA and Others v Post Office Ltd
...constituted a good reason for terminating the contract, he is entitled to rely on those facts: Boston Deep Sea and Ice Company v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339; British and Benningtons Ltd v North Western Cachar Tea Co Ltd [1923] AC 48, particularly at 72 per Lord Sumner. As to how the allegatio......
-
Geys v Societe Generale, London Branch
...with general principles of the law of contract, was taken as read: see, for example, Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, 365 (Bowen LJ) and General Billposting Co Ltd v Atkinson [1909] AC 118, 122 (Lord 81 Then came the important decision of the High Court of Aus......
-
Foster Bryant Surveying Ltd and anor v Bryant and anor
...the law's dislike of secret profits (which the law does regard as dishonestly obtained, see Boston Deep Sea Fishing & Ice Co v. Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, cited by Lord Wright at 155) was applied to the instant case. It would thus seem that even though the directors had in fact been proved ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
IP Bulletin - May 2012
...did justify the termination of the Agreement and on which Leofelis could properly rely (following Boston Deep Sea Fishing v Amsell (1888) 39 Ch D 339). Lonsdale acknowledged the Boston Deep Sea Fishing principle but said that this would not give Leofelis a good defence to Lonsdale's claim f......
8 books & journal articles
-
RE-EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUTUAL PROMISES IN CONTRACT LAW.
...J) ((George"); Healey v SA Francaise Rubastic [1917] 1 KB 946, 947 (Avory J). See also Boston Deep Sea Fishing & Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, 366, in which Bowen LJ held that an employee may have argued that he was entitled to quarterly payment notwithstanding that his salary was......
-
SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
...v Dato' Haji Mohamed Haniffa bin Haji Abdullah [2007] 6 AMR 27; [2007] 6 MLJ 293. See also Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339 and Furs Ltd v Tomkies (1936) 54 CLR 583. 159 [1979] AC 374 at 380, per Lord Diplock. 160 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134......
-
Contract administration
...(1841) 4 Y & C Ex 475 at 483–484, per Lord Denman CJ [160 Er 1094 at 1097]; and see also Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339 at 367–368, per Bowen LJ. as to when a proprietary remedy will be available, see Daraydan Holdings Ltd v Solland International Ltd [2005] C......
-
Preliminary Sections
...2 All E R 76 193 Bold v. Brough, Nicholson and Hall Ltd, (1964) 1 W.L.R. 201 158 Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co. v. Ansel! (188) 39 Ch.D. 339. . 113 Braide v. Adoki, 10 N.L.R. 15. 152 Buchler v. Buchler (1947) 1 All E.R. 319. 24 Bullen v. The Swan Electric Engraving Company (1907) 23 T.......
Request a trial to view additional results