Boswell v Coaks

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date30 April 1894
Judgment citation (vLex)[1894] UKHL J0430-1
Date30 April 1894

[1894] UKHL J0430-1

House of Lords

Boswell
and
Coaks.
1

After hearing Counsel for the Appellant this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of James Freeman Boswell, of The Close, in the precincts of the Cathedral, in the City of Norwich, Wine and Spirit and Corn Merchant, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 5th of November 1892, so far as the same affects the Defendant Isaac Bugg Coaks, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order, so far as aforesaid, might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the said Isaac Bugg Coaks, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the said Respondent, but not called on; and due consideration had of what was offered for the said Appellant:

2

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 5th of November 1892, be, and the same is, hereby Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellant do pay, or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Tassan Din v Banco Ambrossiano S.P.A.
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1991
    ...pursuance of an appellate jurisdiction. 39 Counsel for Tassan Din relied upon the decision of the House of Lords in Boswell .v. Coaks 11 App. Cas. 232 (reported in the English Reports 1894 at page 167) and in particular the passage from the judgment of the Earl of Selborne (at page 170 of ......
  • Bula Holdings and Others v Roche and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 May 2008
    ...... BULA LTD (IN RECEIVERSHIP) & ORS v CROWLEY & ORS UNREP MURPHY 10.6.2005 2005/6/1209 2005 IEHC 212 CONSTITUTION ART 34 BOSWELL v COAKES 1894 6 R 167 AMPTHILL PEERAGE 1977 AC 547 ST ALBANS INVESTMENT CO & SUN ALLIANCE v LONDON INSURANCE & PROVINCIAL INSURANCE CO ......
  • Greendale Developments Ltd, Re, (No. 3)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 December 1999
    ...... SYAL V HEYWARD 1948 49 TLR 476, 1948 2 AER 576 JONESCO V BEARD 1930 AC 298 KENNEDY V DANDRICK 1943 2 AER 606 BOSWELL V COAKES 1894 6 R 167 CONSTITUTION ART 34.4.2 CONSTITUTION ART 34.4.4 CONSTITUTION ART 34.4.5 ......
  • Balber Kaur Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 March 2017
    ....... . 40 In Boswell v Coaks (No.2) (1894) 6 R. 167 the House of Lords was again concerned with an action seeking to set aside a judgment of the House of Lords in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • English Influences on the Historical Development of Fiduciary Duties in Scottish Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh Law Review Nbr. , January 2014
    • 1 January 2014
    ...(HL); De Cordova v De Cordova (1878–79) LR 4 App Cas 692 at 703; Plowright v Lambert (1885) 52 LT 646; Boswell v Coaks (No 1) (1886) LR 11 App Cas 232; In Re Postlethwaite (1887) LR 35 Ch D 722; Farrar v Farrar (1889) LR 40 Ch D 395 at 409–10 & 415; Salomon v Salomon [1897] AC 22 (HL); Lagu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT