Bowater v Rowley Regis Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1944
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 cases
  • Simmons v Swan Brothers Ltd and Forth-Ryco Ltd and Marriott International Services Ltd 1986 Civil Jur. No. 123
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 12 January 1995
    ...Aviation LtdUNK [1936] 3 All ER 241 Merrington v Ironbridge Metal WorksUNK [1952] 2 All ER 1101 Bowater v Rowley Regis CorporationUNK [1944] 1 All ER 465 Occupiers and Highway Authorities Liability Act 1978 Negligence — Duty of care — Personal injury — Fall into open elevator shaft while wo......
  • Takong Tabari v Government of Sarawak
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1994
  • Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 July 1964
    ...employer and employee almost disappeared. The reasons for this are made plain in the judgment of Goddard L.J. in the case of Bowater v. Rowley Regis Corporation [1944] K.B. 476. He said that the maxim must be applied with extreme caution in the case of master and servant, adding: "Indeed, I......
  • London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 9 May 1951
    ...he was volens within the meaning applied to that word in the phrase volenti non fit injuria as interpreted by Scott, L.J., in Bowater v. Rowley Regis Corporation [1944] K.B. 9The Appellants on their part contended that the duty of an invitor was of a lesser order than either of those claim......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • A social security perspective of employees’ compensation law in Nigeria
    • South Africa
    • Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , November 2022
    • 9 November 2022
    ...v Quartermaine (1887) 18 QBD 658 at 696, per Bowen LJ; Thrussell v Handyside (1888) 20 QBD 359; Bowater v Rowley Regis Corporation (1944) 1 KB 476; Wheeler v New Merton Board Mills Ltd (1933) 2 KB 669 where it was held that volenti non fit injuria cannot be pleaded as a defence in an action......
  • Must the Surgeon Take the Pill? Negligence Duty in the Context of Cognitive Enhancement
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 77-1, January 2014
    • 1 January 2014
    ...on an employer’s responsibilities in relation to workplace stress seeGoodman, ibid. On the volenti defence see Bowater vRowley Regis BC [1944] KB 476 (CA).Imogen Goold and Hannah Maslen© 2014 The Authors. The Modern Law Review © 2014 The Modern Law Review Limited. 85(2014) 77(1) MLR CONCLUS......
  • Tortious Liability in China's Motorsports Industry
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law No. 51-1, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...Commonwealth of Australia [2005] NSWCA 25, 75.252. Randwick City Council v Muzic [2006] NSWCA 66, ¶ 48.253. Bowater v. Rowley Regis Corp. [1944] KB 476, 479 (Eng.).254. New South Wales v Fahy (2007) 232 CLR 486.255. Id. ¶ 88.256. Bowater, [1944] KB at 479.257. Panel of Eminent Persons, supr......
  • Autonomy and vulnerability at the death bed.
    • Australia
    • University of Western Sydney Law Review No. 10, January 2006
    • 1 January 2006
    ...Mass., Harvard University Press, (1987). (47) S S Canetto and J D Hollenshead, above n 43, 180. (48) Bowater v Rowley Regis Corpn. [1944] KB 476, 479 (Scott (49) Section 293(2) Dutch Criminal Code and Article 2 of the Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT