Bowers v Kennedy

JurisdictionScotland
CourtCourt of Session (Inner House - First Division)
Judgment Date28 June 2000
Docket NumberNo 54
Date28 June 2000

FIRST DIVISION

No 54
BOWERS
and
KENNEDY

Heritable property and conveyancingRes merae facultatisRight of access to landlocked subjects over neighbouring propertyLandlocked subjects and neighbouring property disponed by same owner when splitting up estateWhether right of access to landlocked subjects implied in title to subjectsWhether right of access imprescriptible as res merae facultatisPrescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 (cap 52), sched 3, para (c)1

A farm was sold in 1945 but under exception of a group of buildings known as Wynton Knackery which was landlocked. The disposition of the farm reserved to the Knackery a right of access and egress by the roads through the farm. Eight days later the Knackery, which was then occupied by a chemical company, was disponed to the company together with the right to use all existing service roads and ways over any other parts of the farm as a means of access and egress. The chemical company stopped using the Knackery by about 1970. The farm was acquired by the pursuers from intermediate owners in 1972 under a disposition which made reference to the burdens created over the farm in 1945. In about 1974 the pursuers constructed a fence without a gate across the access road at a point near the Knackery and at a later date they shut off the access road at its junction with the public road. The defender acquired the Knackery in 1996 and instructed the removal of the fence with a view to reinstating the access road. The pursuers raised an action in the sheriff court and sought interdict against the defender from entering upon or interfering with the farm lands. The defender counterclaimed for declarator that he had a real right of access in terms of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Barry Peart And Another V. Symon B. Legge
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 6 September 2007
    ...of access falls within the scope of section 8 and is therefore subject to the long negative prescription was settled in Bowers v Kennedy 2000 SC 555 (per Lord President Rodger at 559C, paragraph [8]). That case also illustrated what is meant by res merae facultatis. Despite loss of the expr......
1 books & journal articles
  • Land Registration and the Decline of Property Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...reservation, acquiescence, necessity,1717I.e. a right of access constituted in accordance with the rule identified in Bowers v Kennedy 2000 SC 555. and, perhaps most importantly, by prescription. Before this policy evolved the Keeper did on occasion accept evidence that a servitude had been......