Bozson v Altrincham UDC

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1903
Year1903
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
215 cases
  • Salter R & Company v Ghosh
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 April 1971
    ...was the nature of the application to theCourt: and not the nature of the order which the Court eventually made. But in Bozson v. Altrincham Urban Distrist Council (1903) 1 K. B. 547, the Court said that the test was the nature of the order as made. Lord Alverstone, Lord Chief Justice, said......
  • Ganad Media Sdn Bhd v Dato' Bandar Kuala Lumpur
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2002
  • Epacland Sdn Bhd v Kean Seong Company Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd and Another v Fraser & Neave Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 11 October 2001
    ...two prevailing tests. One was enunciated in Salaman v Warner [1891] 1 QB 734 and the other in Bozson v Altrincham Urban District Council [1903] 1 KB 547.The Salaman test, which is also known as the application test, was formulated as follows by Fry LJ (supra at 736): ... an order is `final`......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1985. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...Ors, (1974) 1 All N.L.R. (Part 2) 360 at 366 ......433 47 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1985 PART I Bozson v. Altrincham Urban District Council (1903) 1 K.B. 547 at 349 - 550 149 Bradbury v. Cooper (1884) 12 Q.B. 94. ....................................................... 283 Brigbo & Ors v. Eyin Pe......
  • Civil Appeals in Ontario: How the Interlocutory/Final Distinction Became So Complicated and the Case for a Simple Solution.
    • Canada
    • Queen's Law Journal Vol. 45 No. 2, March 2020
    • 22 March 2020
    ...LJQB 624 (CA (Eng)). For an explanation of Salaman v Warner, see Sopinka, Gelowitz & Rankin, supra note 6 at [section] 1.22. (47.) [1903] 1 KB 547 at 548, 72 LJKB 271 (CA (Eng)). For an explanation of Bozson, see Sopinka, Gelowitz & Rankin, supra note 6 at [section][section] (48.) S......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...order. 6.71 The Court of Appeal held that the applicable test was that set down in Bozson v Altrincham Urban District Council[1903] 1 KB 547 at 548—549 which is: “Does the judgment or order, as made, finally dispose of the rights of the parties? If it does, then … it ought to be treated as ......
  • THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION MADE ON AN INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...Ltd [2013] 3 SLR 354 at [46]. 103OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 at [18]. 104[1903] 1 KB 547. Pinsler, Principles of Civil Procedure (Academy Publishing, 2013) at p 947: The principle governing [appeals is]: ‘The resources necessary f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT