Bradford Old Bank v Sutcliffe
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1918 |
Year | 1918 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
105 cases
-
Tan Sim Lay and Another v Lim Kiat Seng and Another
...breach committed by Lim and Liew.In the other authority relied on by the defendants` counsel, namely, Bradford Old Bank Ltd v Sutcliffe [1918] 2 KB 833 Scrutton LJ was of the view that a demand was generally not necessary but would be only if `the debt is not present but to accrue.` That ca......
- Allied Bank (M) Bhd v Yau Jiok Hua
- Public Bank Berhad v Tan Sri Datuk Yacob bin Hitam
- United Malayan Banking Corporation Bhd v Datin Theresah bt Abdullah and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...2 All E.R. 76; (1943) A.C. 517; 112 L.J.P. 58; 169 L.T. 33; 59 T.L.R. 315; 87 Sol. Jo. 220. 171 Bradford Old Bank Ltd. v. Sutcliffe (1918) 2 K.B. 833; 88 L.J.K.B. 85; 119 L.T. 727; 34 T.L.R. 619; 62 Sol. Jo. 753. 125 Broad v. Gamgee 21 Q.B.D. 244; 57 L.J.M.C. 105; 38 L.T. 680: 42 J.P. 583; ......
-
Table of cases
...264 Boyd v. Nasmith (1888), 17 O.R. 40, [1888] O.J. No. 73 (C.P.) .......................... 284 Bradford Old Bank Ltd. v. Sutcliffe, [1918] 2 K.B. 833 (C.A.)..........................................................187–88, 201, 245 Bradshaw Estate v. Bank of Montreal, 2008 YKSC 17 ..............
-
Bank Accounts
...See Chapter 6, Section D(1). 46 Parr’s Banking Co . Ltd. v. Yates , [1898] 2 Q.B. 460 (C.A.). 47 Bradford Old Bank Ltd . v. Sutcliffe , [1918] 2 K.B. 833 (C.A.). 48 Chapter 8, Section E. Bank and Customer Law in Canada 246 In England, a deposit receipt has been clearly held not to be a nego......
-
Banking Law
...for payment was made and the limitation period therefore, ran from that point in time. Mr Lim cited Bradford Old Bank, Ltd v Sutcliffe[1918] 2 KB 833 for the proposition he advanced. In the case of a demand guarantee, as a matter of principle, it is no defence for the guarantor to argue tha......
Request a trial to view additional results