Bradford v MacLeod

JurisdictionScotland
Year1986
Date1986
CourtHigh Court of Justiciary
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ezam bin Mohd Nor
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 2001
  • The Procurator Fiscal, Aberdeen V. Sean Pirie
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 28 Abril 2011
    ...that there was a real possibility of partiality on the part of the presiding justice (para 11); and appeal allowed. Bradford v McLeod 1986 SLT 244 approved. Lawal v Northern Spirit LtdUNK [2004] 1 All ER 187 applied. Sean Douglas Pirie was charged and arraigned to be tried before the justic......
  • Flowers Development Company Ltd v The Bahamas Telecommunications Company Ltd
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 29 Noviembre 2022
    ...There is an uneasy tension between these tests and that which was adopted in Scotland by the High Court of Justiciary in Bradford v McLeod 1986 SLT 244. Following Eve J's reference in Law v Chartered Institute of Patent Agents [1919] 2 Ch 276, [1918–19] All ER Rep Ext 1237 ( which was not ......
  • S v Bruinders
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Padovani v Italy [1993] ECHR 12: considered Piersack v Belgium (1982) 5 EHRR 169 ([1982] ECHR 6): considered. Scotland D Bradford v McLeod 1986 SLT 244: Doherty v McGlennan 1997 SLT 444: considered. Case Information Appeal from convictions in a magistrates' court. The facts appear from E th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Scots Law Seen from South of the Border
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2012
    • 1 Enero 2012
    ...with current thinking. It is the same test as that which I had persuaded the High Court of Justiciary to adopt in Bradford v Macleod19191986 SLT 244 at 247. about 25 years previously. So Helow is another example of a situation where the Supreme Court is required to consider and apply a comm......
  • JUDICIAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC LAW: CHALLENGING THE PRECONCEPTIONS OF A TROUBLED TAXONOMY.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 2, December 2017
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...the chairmanship of Lord Dunpark. See now Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session 1994) 1994 (Scot) ch 58. (99) Bradford v McLeod 1986 SLT 244; Doherty v McGlennan 1997 SLT (100) Shepherd v Howman 1918 JC 78; David Lawson Ltd v Torrance 1929 JC 119. (101) Consider, for example, the c......
  • Judicial Bias and Disqualification after Pinochet (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-1, January 2000
    • 1 Enero 2000
    ...Criminal Trials – the Consequences of RvGough’ (1998) Cr LR148–149. This approach was adopted by the courts in Scotland: Bradford vMcLeod 1986 SLT 244,247, Law vChartered Institute of Patent Agents [1919] 2 Ch 276, 279.12 RvGough [1993] AC 646 at 654.13 ibid at 655.14 ibid at 667 and 659.15......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT