Bradlaugh v Newdegate

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Johnson v Cook-Bodden
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court
    • 2 Julio 1999
  • Shah v Karanjia
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Martell v Consett Iron Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 3 Febrero 1955
    ...authorities on this curious branch of the law are reviewed in the Judgment of Lord Coleridges in the famous case (decided in 1883) of Bradlaugh v. Newdegate, 11 Queen's Bench Division, page 1, and I do not propose to refer to them at length. It is, however, worth noting that whereas in the ......
  • Condliffe v Hislop and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 Octubre 1995
    ...assistance to a person who was in the position of the plaintiff in the present case. As long ago as 1883 Lord Coleridge C.J. said in Bradlaugh v Newdigate 11 QBD 1 at page 9 that if the maintainer have a common interest with the plaintiff in the result of the suit his acts "which would......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Third Party Funding In Hong Kong
    • Hong Kong
    • Mondaq Hong Kong
    • 20 Noviembre 2015
    ...of arbitration, with appropriate safe guards to mitigate perceived negative implications. Footnotes 1 Bradlaugh v Newdegate (1883) LR 11 QBD 1 at 2 Unruh v Seeberger (2007) 10 HKCFAR 31, para 82 3 Unruh v Seeberger (2007) 10 HKCFAR 31, para 82 4 Re Trepca Mines Ltd (No 2) [1963] Ch 199 at p......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT