Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate Steam Navigation Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date19 November 1923
Date19 November 1923
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Shipping Law In Ireland - A Guide
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 17 December 2012
    ...consignee and carrier. The Irish courts would follow the leading UK case Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Stream Navigation Co Ltd (1924) 1 K.B 575 where the preconditions for implying a contract were held to be: the holder of the bill must have some interest in the property; the action......
3 books & journal articles
  • Carriage of Goods under Bills of Lading and Similar Documents
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Maritime Law
    • 27 August 2003
    ...H. & N. 630 at 636, 158 E.R. 260 at 263. 66 Effort Shipping Co. v. Linden Management S.A., (The Giannis NK), [1998] A.C. 605 (H.L.). 67 [1924] 1 K.B. 575 (C.A.) [Brandt's]. 68 See Captain Gregos (No. 2) (The), [1990] 2 Lloyd's L.R. 395 (C.A.); Quadro Ship-ping NV v. Bizky &> Co. (The Protea......
  • Third party rights under shipping contracts in English and South African law
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...1986 Lloyd's Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly 294. 137 There were also others. See the sources referred to infra at note 153. 138 [1924] 1 KB 575 (CA). 139 See the earlier cases of Cock v Taylor (1811) 13 East 399, 104 ER 424; Stindt v Roberts (1848) 17 LJ QB 166; White & Co v Furness, W......
  • RIGHTS UNDER BILLS OF LADING: TRAWLING THROUGH SINGAPORE WATERS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...from the leading case which established its existence, viz, Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate Steam Navigation Company Limited[1924] 1 KB 575 (“Brandt v Liverpool”). For the necessary circumstances to establish the Brandt v Liverpool implied contract: see Mitsui & Co Ltd v Novoross......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT