Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate Steam Navigation Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date19 November 1923
Date19 November 1923
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 cases
  • Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Company Ltd (Aliakmon)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 December 1984
    ...buyers can rely upon an implied contract between them and the shipowners on the terms of the bill of lading as was done in Brandt v. Liverpool Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. [1924] 1 King's Bench 575. In that case the bill of lading was endorsed to pledgees and no general property in the goods ......
  • Hispanica de Petroleos S.A. v Vencedora Oceanica Navegacion S.A. (No. 2) (Note) (Kapetan Markos N.L., Santillana)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 July 1987
    ...to sue under it in contract or under an implied contract in the same terms, by virtue of the principle exemplified in Brandt v. Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate S.N. Co. [1924] 1 K.B. 575. Reliance might have been placed on the fact that Petroliber, who by then had become holders of the b......
  • Borealis AB v Stargas Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 March 2001
    ...contract as fully encompassing the rights and obligations of the carrier on the terms of the bill of lading: Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate Steam Navigation Co Ltd [1924] 1 KB 575, Bankes, Scrutton and Atkin LJJ, affirming a decision of Greer J (a combination of unparalleled di......
  • Mitsui & Company Ltd v Novorossiysk Shipping Company (Gudermes)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Shipping Law In Ireland - A Guide
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 17 December 2012
    ...consignee and carrier. The Irish courts would follow the leading UK case Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Stream Navigation Co Ltd (1924) 1 K.B 575 where the preconditions for implying a contract were held to be: the holder of the bill must have some interest in the property; the action......
3 books & journal articles
  • Carriage of Goods under Bills of Lading and Similar Documents
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Maritime Law
    • 27 August 2003
    ...H. & N. 630 at 636, 158 E.R. 260 at 263. 66 Effort Shipping Co. v. Linden Management S.A., (The Giannis NK), [1998] A.C. 605 (H.L.). 67 [1924] 1 K.B. 575 (C.A.) [Brandt's]. 68 See Captain Gregos (No. 2) (The), [1990] 2 Lloyd's L.R. 395 (C.A.); Quadro Ship-ping NV v. Bizky &> Co. (The Protea......
  • Third party rights under shipping contracts in English and South African law
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...1986 Lloyd's Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly 294. 137 There were also others. See the sources referred to infra at note 153. 138 [1924] 1 KB 575 (CA). 139 See the earlier cases of Cock v Taylor (1811) 13 East 399, 104 ER 424; Stindt v Roberts (1848) 17 LJ QB 166; White & Co v Furness, W......
  • RIGHTS UNDER BILLS OF LADING: TRAWLING THROUGH SINGAPORE WATERS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...from the leading case which established its existence, viz, Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate Steam Navigation Company Limited[1924] 1 KB 575 (“Brandt v Liverpool”). For the necessary circumstances to establish the Brandt v Liverpool implied contract: see Mitsui & Co Ltd v Novoross......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT