En breve de Entre en nature de Assize p Edward Butler v Ann Gray en qui el
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 323
DEL COMMON-BANK
[5] X. En breva de Entre en nature de Assize p Edward Butler vers Ann Gray en qui el plead qui non disseiai, sur Evidence done, & sur ceo uii Demurrer enter, le Case fuit, que Edmund Seignior Gray fuit seisi del terre demand in fee & per Indenture dated 30 H. 8. enter Thomas Seignior Awdley, Thomas Seignior Crumwell, William Pawlet Chevalier, & Auters de 1'uu part, & le dit Seignior Edmund Gray de Tauter part, le dit Seignior Edmund bargain et vende al dits Thomas Awdley, Thomas Crumwell & auters le marriage order & government le dit John Gray adonques son fits & heir apparant, ad intentionem maritandi ad appunct & placitum prsedicti Domini Awdley, Domini Crumwell & aliorum, vel assignatorum suorum absque disparagatione, & le Seignior Gray covenant de faire estate del dit terre & auters al value de 1001. per Ann. al dits Seignior Awdeley et auters a tener a eux quousque, &c., pro & erga manutenentionem prsedict. Johan. Gray & hujusmodi ux prout ipse duceret per appunctuationem & nominationem le dit Seignior Awdeley, & Crumwell & auters, le Remainder ouster, apres que le dit J, Gray viendr a son plein age de 21. Ans, a le dit John Griy & tiel femme que il marier come devant est dit & a les heirs males del corps le dit John Gray engendres oue divers remainders ouster, apres que fine fuit levy al use de ceux Indentures & le dit Seignior Crumwell morust devant ascun appointment qu nominacion de femme a John Gray, apres que mort les dits Seignior Awdley & auters per lour escript appoint le dit Ann d'estre femme le dit John, per quel appointpienfc le dit John maria le dit Ann, & apres il levy fine del ditt erre a autert al use le dit Edward Butler & bbs heirs que enter & fuit seisi, & apres le dit John Gray morust, & le dit Ann enter, &c. Sur que le Defendant port le breve, & pur ceo que appiert que le Seignior Crumwell fuit...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fowler v Keegan Quarries Ltd
... ... 160 of the 2000 Act, yet the serious nature of the breaches did not warrant the refusal of ... Mahon v. Butler [1997] 3 I.R. 369 applied ... ...
-
Fleming (Inspector of Taxes) v Associated Newspapers Ltd
...on business entertainment of sellers—otherwise the exemption in subsection (9) would be co-incident with the imposition in subsections ( 1) and (5). I find it quite impossible to believe that Parliament could have intended any distinction according to whether it was buyers or sellers who we......
-
Swain v Waverley Municipal Council
...96 Mr Williams was not asked whether the general practice to place flags opposite a sandbank would have been general practice at both 6am and 5pm or when the tide was flowing in or running out. In other words, he was not asked to identify the general practice at different times of the day a......
-
Delano Smith Appellant v R Respondent [ECSC]
...brawl, although he described his role as that of a peacemaker; (4) Abbott's compelling eyewitness account of the appellant stabbing Christie and (5) the undisputed evidence that Abbott ran away from the appellant and the appellant chased him. 55 In my judgment there has not been any miscarr......