Brewer v Jacobs

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1923
Year1923
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Re Drew, a Bankrupt
    • Ireland
    • High Court (Irish Free State)
    • 21 juin 1929
    ...as regards the sub-tenants: I assume that the Act of 1923 protects their interests. (1) [1923] 2 Ch. 347. (2) [1924] 1 I. R. 22. (3) [1923] 1 K. B. 528. (4) [1923] 1 K. B. (1) [1923] 2 Ch. 347. (1) [1924] 1 I. R. 22. (2) [1923] 1 K. B. 528. of those provisions is that he shall pay his rent,......
  • Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahon
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 octobre 2000
    ...tenancy. It is concerned with the forfeiture of an existing term and can have no application after the contractual term has expired: see Brewer v. Jacobs [1923] 1 K.B. 528. It is a true proviso; that is to say, it operates as a qualification of or in derogation from what has gone before. A ......
  • Chan Nan Fong v Chan Tak Wah
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 2 mars 1971
    ...Court (Civil Jurisdiction & Procedure) Ordinance (vide Megarry on The Rent Acts, 10th Edition, Volume 1, at p.247; Brewer v. Jacobs (1923) 1 K.B. 528; per Jenkins L.J. in Dellenty v. Pellow (1951) 1 All E.R. 11. In the days when tenancy appeals were heard by the Supreme Court in its summary......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT