Bridges v Hawkesworth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1851
Date1851
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • Parker v British Airways Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 décembre 1981
    ...and British Airways. Mr Brown, for Mr Parker, relies heavily upon the decision of Patteson and Wightman JJ., sitting in banc in Bridges v. Hawkesworth, (1851) 15 The Jurist, 1079, and 21 L.J. (N.S.), 75. It was an appeal from the County Court by case stated. The relevant facts, as found, we......
  • Hannah v Peel
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • National Crime Authority v Flack
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • THE LAW OF ABANDONMENT AND THE PASSING OF PROPERTY IN TRASH
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 décembre 2011
    ...and located), whereupon it becomes the property of the finder - see Armory v Delamirie (1722) 1 Stra 505; Bridges v Hawkesworth (1851) 21 LJQB 75; Moffatt v Kazana [1969] 2 QB 152; Parker v British Airways Board [1982] 1 All ER 834. 94 See, in particular, Williams v Phillips (1957) 41 Cr Ap......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT