Bridges v Hawkesworth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench
Date1851
Year1851

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Parker v British Airways Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 December 1981
    ...and British Airways. Mr Brown, for Mr Parker, relies heavily upon the decision of Patteson and Wightman JJ., sitting in banc in Bridges v. Hawkesworth, (1851) 15 The Jurist, 1079, and 21 L.J. (N.S.), 75. It was an appeal from the County Court by case stated. The relevant facts, as found, we......
  • Hannah v Peel
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Held , that the plaintiff, as finder, was entitled to the possession of the brooch as against all others than its owner ... Bridges v. Hawkesworth ( 1851 ) 21 L. J. (Q. B.) 75 ; 15 Jur. 1079 , followed ... South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Sharman [ 1896 ] 2 Q ... ...
  • Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • National Crime Authority v Flack
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • THE LAW OF ABANDONMENT AND THE PASSING OF PROPERTY IN TRASH
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...and located), whereupon it becomes the property of the finder - see Armory v Delamirie (1722) 1 Stra 505; Bridges v Hawkesworth (1851) 21 LJQB 75; Moffatt v Kazana [1969] 2 QB 152; Parker v British Airways Board [1982] 1 All ER 834. 94 See, in particular, Williams v Phillips (1957) 41 Cr Ap......