Bridlington Relay Ltd v Yorkshire Electricity Board

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1965
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Hunter v London Docklands Development Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 October 1995
    ...from Crystal Palace. As an interference with their enjoyment of their premises, it was an actionable nuisance. 11In Bridlington Relay Ltd v Yorkshire Electricity Board [1965] Ch 436 the plaintiffs erected a mast in order to provide a relay system of sound and television broadcasts. The def......
  • Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 April 1997
    ...give rise to an action in private nuisance. This question was first considered over thirty years ago by Buckley J. in Bridlington Relay Ltd. v. Yorkshire Electricity Board [1965] Ch. 436. That case was concerned not with interference caused by the presence of a building, but with electrical......
  • Kitzing v Fuller
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 31 March 2016
    ...Mr Rosenthal sought to distinguish the observations (relied upon by Mr Grant) of Buckley J in the case of Bridlington Relay Limited v Yorkshire Electricity Board [1965] Ch 436, at 445 between C and D, on the footing that they were confined to quia timet injunction proceedings. In my judgme......
  • OG Heights Management Corporation v One Aug Land Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2012
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Nuisance — the Environmental Tort? Hunter v Canary Wharf in the House of Lords
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 61-6, November 1998
    • 1 November 1998
    ...(which had been before the Court of Appeal) was not in issue in the House of Lords.5Bridlington Relay Ltd vYorkshire Electricity Board [1965] Ch 436. Whether such interference couldbe actionable was left open: Lord Goff emphasised the increased social importance of TV (n 3 above,685) and Lo......
  • Of Coase and Corn: A (Sort of) Defence of Private Nuisance
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 63-2, March 2000
    • 1 March 2000
    ...in the absence of a collective goal. F. A. Hayek, Law,Legislation and Liberty (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982) vol 2, ch 7.49 [1965] Ch 436, 447.50 (1865) 11 HL Cas 642. I would argue that the same thing has happened to Rylands vFletcher (1866)LR1 Exch 265, affd (1868) LR3 HL 330, w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT