Brilliant v Michaels

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1945
Year1945
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • John Thomas Abberley v David John Abberley
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 19 June 2019
    ...to a future event, which may not occur, and if it does occur, the day on which it will occur is uncertain (see Brilliant v Michaels [1945] 1 All ER 121 at 125 per Evershed J).” 47 In the present case, Ms Taskis relies upon the uncertainties to show that no binding contract was intended or ......
  • Turner v York Motors Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Newman v Dorrington Developments Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Ailion v Spiekermann
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Co. Ltd. v. Ashmore [1967] 1 W.L.R. 1110; [1967] 2 All E.R. 953. The following additional case was cited in argument: Brilliant v. Michaels [1945] 1 All E.R. 121. ACTION By a writ and statement of claim dated June 14, 1974, the plaintiff vendor, Jack Albert Ailion, claimed against the defen......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Lease
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 15 Lease
    • 10 July 2016
    ...by Great Britain or upon possession of the premises being vacant. See: Swift v. Macbean (1942) 1 K.B. 375 and Brilliant v. Michaels (1945) 1 All E.R. 121. Where parties do in fact enter into such a bargain and intend to bind themselves on, those terms, the agreement, though at first conditi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT