Brinckman v Matley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1904 |
| Year | 1904 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Beckett (Alfred F.) Ltd v Lyons
...when it is covered with water for the purpose of fishing. Bathing, for Instance, is not a public right but goes on by tolerances see Brinckman v. Mayley (1904 2 Chancery 313), a decision of the Court of Appeal following Blundell v. Oatterall (5 Bamewall & Adolphus 68). 14 I cannot find any ......
-
R (on the application of Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council
...question (preaching on the foreshore) although concluding, in accordance with the reasoning in Blundell, that it was a trespass. 40 In Brinckman v Matley [1904] 2 Ch 313, 317, Buckley J, after referring to the fact that it had been applied in two first instance decisions of Mace and Llandu......
-
R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council
...may have induced them to acquiesce in, and even to encourage the practice, as a matter indirectly profitable to themselves." 50 In Brinckman v Matley [1904] 2 Ch 313 it was again contended, in relation to an area of foreshore granted to the owner's predecessors in title by the Crown, that "......
-
New South Wales v Commonwealth of Australia
...in which appears that ‘most remarkable’ judgment of Sir George Holdroyd, described by the Court of Appeal in Brinckman v. MatleyELR [1904] 2 Ch. 313; [1904–7] All E.R. Rep. 941, as ‘one of the first examples we have of the way in which the judgment of an English judge ought to be expressed’......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
RECLAIMING THE PUBLIC TRUST IN SINGAPORE
...[1908] 2 Ch 139. 27 (1821) 5 B & Ald 268 at 294; 106 ER 1190 at 1199—1200. See also Williams v Wilcox(1838) 8 Ad & E 314; 112 ER 857. 28 [1904] 2 Ch 313 at 315—316. 29 1215 issue. 30 Williams v Wilcox, supra n 27. See also The King v Clark(1702) 12 Mod 615; 88 ER 1558. 31 Stuart Moore, & Hu......