Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova A/S

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1966
Year1966
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
37 cases
  • Hollister Incorporated and Another v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 November 2012
    ...to this activity provided the conditions explained by the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-427/93, C-429/93, C-436/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova A/S [1996] ECR I-3457 are met. These conditions, often referred to simply as the BMS conditions, include, as BMS condition (5), a requireme......
  • Desmond Devaux Claimant v [1] Richard Johnson [2] Gerard Bergasse Defendants [ECSC]
    • St Lucia
    • High Court (Saint Lucia)
    • 22 March 2012
    ...action for breach of trust paid out of the trust fund. Counsel cited Re:Spurling's Will Trusts Philpot and Another v Philpot and Others [1966] 1 WLR 920 as applied in Armitage v Nurse [1997] 3 WLR 1046 [1997] 3 WLR 1046 (CA) at 1064B-C and 1065B-C. Based on these authorities I hold that the......
  • ATC (Cayman) v Rothschild Trust
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 12 November 2010
    ...(Cayman) Ltd. v. Crawford Adjusters (Cayman) Ltd., 2008 CILR 482, referred to. (13) Spurling”s Will Trusts, In re, Philpot v. Philpot, [1966] 1 W.L.R. 920; [1966] 1 All E.R. 745, dicta of Ungoed-Thomas J. applied. (14) Turner v. HancockELR(1882), 20 Ch. D. 303; 51 L.J. Ch. 517, dicta of Jes......
  • Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 February 2008
    ... ... Others we were not sure about and found it necessary to refer questions to the ... The key cases are Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova Joined Cases C-427/93 , C-429/93 and C-436/93 , ... ...
  • Get Started for Free