British Fame (Owners) v Macgregor (Owners)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1941
Year1941
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
215 cases
  • Melvina Frett-Henry Appellant v [1] Tortola Concrete Ltd [2] Clayton Smithen Respondents
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal (British Virgin Islands)
    • November 21, 2011
    ...trial judge would be concerned with the blameworthiness of each party as well as the relative importance of the acts causing the damage. The MacGregor [1943] A.C. 197 applied; Davies v Swan Motor Co. (Swansea) Ltd. [1949] 2 K.B. 291 applied. 8. In the present appeal, the trial judge did n......
  • Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • February 8, 2022
    ...the three vessels as contributing causes of the damage or loss”. The nature of the exercise was described by Lord Wright in The MacGregor [1943] AC 197 at p.200 (in a passage followed in The Koningin Juliana [1975] 2 Lloyd's Reports by Lord Simon at p.115) as follows: “a question of the deg......
  • Brown v Thompson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 8, 1967
    ...practice of this court. Perhaps at the risk of being tedious in giving this reminder, the locus classicue of course, is the case of THE MACGREGOR, roported in (1943) AppealCases at page 197. It was an Admiralty decision, which went to the House of Lords, and the speech to which I desire to ......
  • Baker v Willoughby
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 10, 1968
    ...criticise him for this as the matter is often one of impression and not susceptible of precise calculation. As Lord Wright said in British Fame v. Macgregor (1943 Appeal Cases 197 at page 201): "It is a question of the degree of fault depending on a trained and expert judgment considering ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • APPEALS FROM DISCRETIONS, SATISFACTIONS AND VALUE JUDGMENTS: REVIEWING THE HOUSE RULES.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 2, December 2017
    • December 1, 2017
    ...in n 69. In Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALR 529, 532, the High Court quoted British Fame v Macgregor [1943] AC 197, 201, where Lord Wright said that a finding on a question of apportionment is a finding upon 'a question ... not of principle or of positive fin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT