British Murac Syndicate v Alperton Rubber Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1915
Year1915

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Malayan Banking Ltd v Raffles Hotel Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Federal Court (Singapore)
    • 22 December 1965
    ... ... –Person who was not member of a company appointing a director of the company pursuant to ... ...
  • The Wellness Group Pte Ltd v Paris Investment Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 29 August 2018
    ...Bainbridge v Smith (1889) 41 Ch D 462 (distd) BNX v BOE [2018] 2 SLR 215 (folld) British Murac Syndicate Ltd v Alperton Rubber Co Ltd [1915] 2 Ch 186 (refd) Centre for Laser and Aesthetic Medicine Pte Ltd v GPK Clinic (Orchard) Pte Ltd [2018] 1 SLR 180 (folld) Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment......
  • The Wellness Group Pte Ltd v Paris Investment Pte Ltd and others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 29 August 2018
    ...are starkly contrasting. Wellness relies on the English decision of British Murac Syndicate, Limited v Alperton Rubber Company, Limited [1915] 2 Ch 186 (“British Murac”) to argue that the Implied Term gives it an unfettered and unqualified right to appoint Prof Mak, and that its nomination ......
  • Anstalt Nybro v Hong Kong Resort Co Ltd
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 16 August 1978
    ...M. Nourse, Q.C. & C. Ching, Q.C. & Bokhary(Woo, Kwan, Lee & Lo) for Respondent. (1) (1971) 1 W.L.R. 1381 (2) (1972) 1 W.L.R. 307; (3) (1915) 2 Ch. 186; (4) (1868) L.R. 7 Eq. 112; (5) (1902) 1 Ch. 53 (6) (1977) 3 W.L.R. 943; (7) (1874) 3 Ch. D. 621; (8) (1977) 1 Ch. 106; (9) (1968) 1 W.L.R. ......
  • Get Started for Free