British Racing Drivers' Club Ltd v Hextall Erskine & Company (A Firm)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1996
Year1996
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • (1) Jeffrey Herrmann (2) Mina Gerowin Herrmann v Withers LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 Mayo 2012
    ...111 The implications of the 1986 rule changes for the assessment of costs claimed as damages were considered in British Racing Drivers' Club Ltd v Hextall Erskine & Co [1996] PNLR 523. In that case, the plaintiffs had incurred legal fees in attempting to mitigate loss caused by negligence o......
  • Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd and HSBC Securities Services (Luxembourg) Sa
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 13 Junio 2019
    ...[1957] 1 W.L.R. 582; [1957] 2 All E.R. 118, considered. (16)British Racing Drivers Club Ltd. v. Hextall Erskine & Co. (a Firm), [1996] 3 All E.R. 667; [1996] B.C.C. 727; [1996] P.N.L.R. 523, distinguished. (17)Cave v. Robinson Jarvis & Rolf, [2002] UKHL 18; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1107; [2002] 2 Al......
  • Dadourian Group International Inc. (a company incorporated under the Laws of the State of New York) and Others v Azuri Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 Noviembre 2007
    ...The Tiburon (1992) 2 Lloyds Rep 26, Lonrho v Fayed (No 5) [1993] 1 WLR 1489, British Racing Drivers Club Ltd v Hextall Erskine (1996) 3 All ER 667; Mahme Trust Reg v Lloyds TSB Bank plc [2006] EWHC 1321 and Yudt v Leonard Ross & Craig (a firm) Independent, 5 October 1998 (I have not been pr......
  • Sharon Lesley Walsh v Redmayne-Bentley LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 18 Octubre 2019
    ...to mitigate his loss. In support of his mitigation argument I was referred to Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 and British Racing Drivers' Club v Hextall Erskine and Co [1996] PNLR 55 Pilkington v Wood is authority of the proposition that the duty to mitigate does not usually extend so as ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, April 2019
    • 1 Enero 2019
    ...is taken for decisions made by directors of the plaintiff company: British Racing Drivers' Club Ltd v Hextall Erskine & Co [1996] 3 All ER 667; Duke Group Ltd (in liq) v Pilmer (1999) 73 SASR 64, 146 [344] (Doyle CJ, Duggan and Bleby JJ). The promisee may still be guilty of contributory......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT