British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1893
Year1893
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
174 cases
  • Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 July 2011
    ...decided that the claim for breach of the United States copyright was non-justiciable. It held that the rule in British South Africa Co v Companhia de Moçambique [1893] AC 602 that the English court has no jurisdiction to entertain an action for the determination of the title to, or the righ......
  • Re Doyle; ex parte Brien
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 12 November 2008
    ...the other foreign properties (“the Claims”) were caught by the rule in The British South Africa Company v The Companhia de Moçambique [1893] AC 602 (“the Moçambique rule”), the effect of which is that the court has no jurisdiction to determine the title to, or the right to possession of, an......
  • Hesperides Hotels Ltd v Aegean Turkish Holidays Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 July 1978
    ...courts have no jurisdiction) — see Skinner v. East India Company (1666) 6 State Trials 710 British South Africa Co. v. Companhia de Mocambique [1893] A.C. 602 (the " Mocambique case"). To enable himself to deal with the first point May J. addressed an enquiry to the Secretary of State, F......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • English Courts Will Take Jurisdiction For Infringement Of Foreign Patents!
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 8 April 2013
    ...Trooper' helmet from the well known Star Wars films), the Moçambique rule (established in British South Africa Co v Cia de Moçambique [1893] AC 602)1 did not prevent the English courts from hearing claims concerning non-UK designations of patents, so long as validity of the patent was not i......
26 books & journal articles
  • CONTEMPT ORDERS AND JUDICIAL “ATTACHMENT” OF EQUITABLE PROPERTY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...on the territorial limits of the competence of the English courts or of the competence which they will recognise in foreign states”. 96 [1893] AC 602, adopted in Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings Pte Ltd[2010] 4 SLR(R) 840. 97 See R Griggs Group Ltd v Evans[2005] Ch 153, affirmed [2005] EWCA......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Telecommunications Law
    • 6 September 2011
    ...Medical Association v. Marsh (1931), 48 R.P.C. 565 (Ch.) ............... 136 British South Africa Co. v. Companhia de Moçambique, [1893] A.C. 602 (H.L.) ........................................................................... 304 British Telecommunications plc v. One in a Million Ltd., [......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 September 2010
    ...31 C.P.C. (6th) 243, 2006 BCCA 398 ........................................... 98 British South Africa Co. v. Companhia de Moçambique, [1893] A.C. 602 (H.L.) .......................................................313, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319 British South Africa Co. v. De Beers Consolidated......
  • Specific Performance: Sale of Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...upon which jurisdiction is based. 113 111 The general principle is taken from British South Africa Co v Companhia de Moçambique , [1893] AC 602 (HL) and Lucasilm Ltd v Ainsworth , [2011] UKSC 39 at para 55. See also the proposed changes of the Uniform Law Conference of Canada in its Uniform......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT