British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd v Harris (Inspector of Taxes)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1938 |
| Year | 1938 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 cases
-
Lord Vestey's Executors and Vestey v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...therefore, invalid. I think I am bound by authority to reject this contention. In the case of British Sugar Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Harris, 21 T.C. 528; [1938] 2 K.B. 220, Finlay, J., following a previous decision of his own, held that the discovery of a point of law warrants the making of a......
-
Vestey's Executors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...I think I am bound by authority to reject this contention. In the case of British Sugar Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Harris, 21 T.C. 528; [1938] 2 K.B. 220, Finlay, J., following a previous decision of his own, held that the discovery of a point of law warrants the making of an additional assessm......
-
Commercial Structures Ltd v Briggs
...Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Harris; and here I am going to refer to the report in the Law Reports, because it is rather fuller-it is in [1938] 2 K.B. 220(1). By an agreement, a company which was carrying on business as manufacturers of beet sugar agreed to pay to two bodies in each of four years......
-
Jones v Mason Investments (Luton) Ltd
...overlooking Mr. Jones's submission that, but for the intervention of the Attorney-General in British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd. v. Harris(1) 21 T.C. 528, at page 548, the Court of Appeal would have held that there was no mistake and the facts of that case were in some respects, perhaps, simil......
Get Started for Free