Broadley v Guy Clapham & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date06 July 1993
Date06 July 1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Broadley
and
Guy Clapham & Co

Court of Appeal

Negligence - medical negligence - limitation of actions - knowledge of plaintiff

Knowledge fixes cause of action

A person alleging medical negligence was fixed with a cause of action when she knew, or could have known with the help of medical advice reasonably obtainable, that her injury had been caused by damage resulting from something done or not done by the surgeon during her operation. Knowledge detailed enough to enable the plaintiff's advisers to draft a statement of claim was not required before time began to run.

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Balcombe, Lord Justice Leggatt and Lord Justice Hoffmann) so held on July 2 when dismissing an appeal by Mrs Maureen Broadley from a finding by Mr Justice Turner on March 24, 1992 that she had no cause of action against Guy Clapham Ltd, a firm of solicitors, for allegedly having failed to prevent her claim against Mr Martin Lowy, a surgeon, from becoming statute-barred.

LORD JUSTICE BALCOMBE said that Hendy v...

To continue reading

Request your trial
103 cases
  • Smith v West Lancashire Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Gough v Neary & Cronin
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 July 2003
    ...said at p. 8 of that judgment:- "First of ail I accept the view taken by the English Court of Appeal in Broadley v. Guy Clapham & Co. [1994] 4 All E.R. 439 that the words "which is alleged to constitute negligence, nuisance or breach of duty" are merely words of identification. Therefore it......
  • Juanita Tyers (widow and executrix of the estate of George Tyers deceased) v Aegis Defence Services (BVI) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 21 April 2023
    ...is unsurprising given the wording of s.14. 41 Thirdly, he submitted that, by reference to such authorities as Broadly v Guy Clapham [1994] 4 All ER 439 and Dobbie v Medway Health Authority [1994] 1 WLR 1234, the date of knowledge is to be interpreted as the date of the accident. Thus, in ......
  • Haward and Others v Fawcetts (A Firm) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 March 2006
    ...what he is complaining about and ask whether he had in broad terms knowledge of the facts on which that complaint is based': Broadley v Guy Clapham & Co [1993] 4 Med LR 328, 11 A similar approach is applicable to the expression 'attributable' in section 14A(8)(a). The statutory provisions ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT