Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2000
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Liverpool Roman Catholic Archdiocesan Trustees Inc. v Goldberg (No. 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 15 Noviembre 2023
    ...plaintiff. Referring to an earlier case in which the Court of Appeal had reached the contrary conclusion, he said: “The effect of Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest [ (Note) [2002] 1 WLR 598] is to deprive a professional man, charged with having given negligent advice and who denies that his ad......
  • Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 15 Noviembre 2023
    ...plaintiff. Referring to an earlier case in which the Court of Appeal had reached the contrary conclusion, he said: “The effect of Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest [ [2002] 1 WLR 598] is to deprive a professional man, charged with having given negligent advice and who denies that his advice wa......
  • Law Society v Sephton & Company (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 Diciembre 2004
    ...defence, because of the provisions of s32(1) (b) as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in Brocklesbury Armitage & Guest (note) [2002] 1 WLR 598, a case decided in 2000, and overruled by Cave. Accordingly, it is scarcely surprising that, as at May 2001, Barlows were not raising any limitatio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Limitation and Deliberate Concealment - <I>Cave </I>v. <I>Robinson Jarvis & Rolf</i>
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 31 Marzo 2002
    ...concealment of facts. The appeal is in effect also an appeal against the Court of Appeal decision in Brocklesby v. Armitage and Guest [2001] 1 All ER 172. In brief, the Court of Appeal decisions have had the result that the limitation period would be extended if there has been a deliberate ......
  • Time Called For Brocklesby? Law Commission Recommend Shorter Limitation Periods
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 1 Agosto 2001
    ...Footnotes 1) Limitation of Actions, Law Commission Report No.270, 9th July 2001, www.lawcom.gov.uk/ library/lib-com.htm#liblc270 2) [2001] 1 All ER 172 3) Unreported, Court of Appeal 20th February 2001, www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgments 4) Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Limited [1994] 2 AC ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT