Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
- Liverpool Roman Catholic Archdiocesan Trustees Inc. v Goldberg (No. 1)
-
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
...[2015] 2 CLC 437. Beaman v ARTS Ltd [1949] 1 KB 550. Brett v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2014] EWHC 2974 (Admin). Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest [2002] 1 WLR 598. Bulli Coal Mining Co v Osborne [1899] AC 351. Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolf (a firm) [2002] UKHL 18; [2003] 1 CLC 101; [2003......
-
Law Society v Sephton & Company (A Firm)
...there was no limitation defence, because of the provisions of s32(1) (b) as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in Brocklesbury Armitage & Guest (note) [2002] 1 WLR 598, a case decided in 2000, and overruled by Cave. Accordingly, it is scarcely surprising that, as at May 2001, Barlows were n......
-
Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd and another
...plaintiff. Referring to an earlier case in which the Court of Appeal had reached the contrary conclusion, he said: “The effect of Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest [ (Note) [2002] 1 WLR 598] is to deprive a professional man, charged with having given negligent advice and who denies that his ad......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Limitation and Deliberate Concealment - <I>Cave </I>v. <I>Robinson Jarvis & Rolf</i>
...concealment of facts. The appeal is in effect also an appeal against the Court of Appeal decision in Brocklesby v. Armitage and Guest [2001] 1 All ER 172. In brief, the Court of Appeal decisions have had the result that the limitation period would be extended if there has been a deliberate ......
-
Time Called For Brocklesby? Law Commission Recommend Shorter Limitation Periods
...Footnotes 1) Limitation of Actions, Law Commission Report No.270, 9th July 2001, www.lawcom.gov.uk/ library/lib-com.htm#liblc270 2) [2001] 1 All ER 172 3) Unreported, Court of Appeal 20th February 2001, www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgments 4) Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Limited [1994] 2 AC ......