Brooks v Bagshaw

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1904
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Perumal v PP
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • R (McDonnell) v Tyrone Justices
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 8 Noviembre 1911
    ...at p. 63. (2) 5 C. B. 553. (3) 9 C. B. (N. S.) 103. (4) [1908] 2 I. R. 429. (5) I. R. 8 C. L. 50. (1) 13 L. J. (N. S.) M. C. 58. (2) [1904] 2 K. B. 798, at p. (3) [1901] P. 60, at p. 63. (1) [1901] P. 60. (1) [1901] P. 69. (2) 4 & 15 Vict. c. 90. (1) 36 & 37 Vict. c. 82. (2) 27 Geo. 3, c. 3......
  • R (Futter) v The Justices for The County of Cork
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 8 Mayo 1917
    ...50 of the Fisheries (Ireland) Act, 1850 (13 & 14 Vict. c. 88). Beardsley v. Giddings, [1904] 1 K. B. 847, and Brooks v. Bagshaw, [1904] 2 K. B. 798, applied. Held also, that since a complaint had in fact been made to the justice before he issued one summons (which had been quashed), it was ......
  • Kwok Tak Ying v Hksar
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 11 Octubre 2021
    ...a criminal prosecution, whether public or private, is instituted once an information is laid or a complaint is made: Brooks v Bagshaw [1904] 2 KB 798, per Lord Alverstone CJ at p.801; R v Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Hill [1983] 1 AC 328, per Lord Roskill at pp.342G-343G; Com......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT